Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 27;56(4):559-565.
doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00547-7. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Acute Femoral Lengthening in Adults Using Step-Cut Osteotomy, Traction Table, and Proximal Femoral Locking Plate Fixation: Surgical Technique and Report of Three Cases

Affiliations

Acute Femoral Lengthening in Adults Using Step-Cut Osteotomy, Traction Table, and Proximal Femoral Locking Plate Fixation: Surgical Technique and Report of Three Cases

Peter Brumat et al. Indian J Orthop. .

Abstract

Introduction: Leg-length discrepancy (LLD) can cause distinct gait and posture disorders that may lead to lifestyle-limiting disability and premature joint degeneration. The purpose of this study was to describe a novel surgical method for acute femoral lengthening in adults with symptomatic structural LLD using step-cut osteotomy, traction table, and proximal femoral locking plate fixation.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated three consecutive adult patients that underwent the procedure at our institution between 2011 and 2019, describing the surgical technique and presenting a report of three cases, including complications assessment.

Results: The average age was 47 years (range 38-58), average BMI was 28.1 kg/m2 (range 26.8-29.9), average ASA score was 2 (range 1-3). The mean pre-operative shortening (2 congenital, 1 posttraumatic) was 21 mm (range 20-23). The average elongation achieved was 18 mm (range 15-20). The average surgery duration was 142 min (range 120-165) and the average estimated blood loss was 558 mL (range 375-900). Symptoms were relieved after the lengthening in all three cases. We observed no complications after the mean 68 months (range 22-125) of follow-up.

Conclusions: Successful correction of structural LLD is challenging, depends on patient selection, meticulous planning, surgical technique and experience. Therefore, it should be considered case-by-case. In the hands of an experienced surgeon, our method of acute femoral lengthening seems safe and suitable for carefully selected cases of structural LLD correction, where the final lengthening goal remains within the critical limits of one-stage leg lengthening and principles of traction table use.

Keywords: Acute lengthening; Femoral elongation; Femoral lengthening; Femoral osteotomy; LLD; Leg length inequality; Leg-length discrepancy; Locking plate; One-stage; Proximal femoral osteotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestS.K. receives consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from DePuy Synthes. Other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Congenital defect responsible for the LLD in cases #1 and #3 was bone shortening
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
LLD in case #2 was a sequela of post-traumatic deformity. X-ray taken with a raise supporting the left leg
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Schematic 3D representation of the step-cut osteotomy (above) and the final position of the osteotomy after mobilization (below)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient #1 with congenital shortening. Immediate postoperative X-ray (A), after 6 months of follow-up (B) and after 106 months of follow-up (C). The osteotomy gaps were not grafted
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Patient #2 with acquired shortening and residual posttraumatic ossifications. Immediate postoperative X-ray (A, B), after 2 months of follow-up (C, D) and after 26 months of follow-up (E, F). The osteotomy gaps were grafted with the autograft bone from the ipsilateral iliac crest
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Patient #3 with congenital shortening. Immediate postoperative X-ray (AC) and after 12 months of follow-up (DF). The osteotomy gaps were grafted with the allograft bone from the hospital’s tissue bank

References

    1. Gurney B. Leg length discrepancy. Gait & Posture. 2002;15:195–206. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00148-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kobayashi, K., Ando, K., Nakashima, H., Machino, M., Morozumi, M., Kanbara, S, et al. (2020). Scoliosis caused by limb-length discrepancy in children. http://www.asianspinejournal.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.31616/asj.2019..... Accessed 3 Jul 2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hosny GA. Limb lengthening history, evolution, complications and current concepts. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 2020;21(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s10195-019-0541-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Friberg O. Clinical symptoms and biomechanics of lumbar spine and hip joint in leg length inequality. Spine. 1983;8(6):643–651. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198309000-00010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bangerter C, Romkes J, Lorenzetti S, Krieg AH, Hasler C-C, Brunner R, et al. What are the biomechanical consequences of a structural leg length discrepancy on the adolescent spine during walking? Gait & Posture. 2019;68:506–513. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.12.040. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources