Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e13353.
doi: 10.1111/mcn.13353. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

Risk factors for self-reported insufficient milk during the first 6 months of life: A systematic review

Sofia Segura-Pérez  1 , Linda Richter  2 , Elizabeth C Rhodes  3 , Amber Hromi-Fiedler  3 , Mireya Vilar-Compte  4 , Misikir Adnew  5 , Kate Nyhan  6 , Rafael Pérez-Escamilla  3
Affiliations

Risk factors for self-reported insufficient milk during the first 6 months of life: A systematic review

Sofia Segura-Pérez et al. Matern Child Nutr. 2022 May.

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review was to identify multifactorial risk factors for self-reported insufficient milk (SRIM) and delayed onset of lactation (DOL). The review protocol was registered a priori in PROSPERO (ID# CDR42021240413). Of the 120 studies included (98 on SRIM, 18 on DOL, and 4 both), 37 (31%) studies were conducted in North America, followed by 26 (21.6%) in Europe, 25 (21%) in East Asia, and Pacific, 15 (12.5%) in Latin America and the Caribbean, 7 (6%) in the Middle East and North Africa, 5 (4%) in South Asia, 3 (2.5%) in Sub-Saharan Africa, and 2 (1.7%) included multiple countries. A total of 79 studies were from high-income countries, 30 from upper-middle-income, 10 from low-middle-income countries, and one study was conducted in a high-income and an upper-middle-income country. Findings indicated that DOL increased the risk of SRIM. Protective factors identified for DOL and SRIM were hospital practices, such as timely breastfeeding (BF) initiation, avoiding in-hospital commercial milk formula supplementation, and BF counselling/support. By contrast, maternal overweight/obesity, caesarean section, and poor maternal physical and mental health were risk factors for DOL and SRIM. SRIM was associated with primiparity, the mother's interpretation of the baby's fussiness or crying, and low maternal BF self-efficacy. Biomedical factors including epidural anaesthesia and prolonged stage II labour were associated with DOL. Thus, to protect against SRIM and DOL it is key to prevent unnecessary caesarean sections, implement the Baby-Friendly Ten Steps at maternity facilities, and provide BF counselling that includes baby behaviours.

Keywords: breastfeeding; cesarean section; delayed onset of lactation; health care system; insufficient milk; maternal obesity; risk factors; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Self‐reported insufficient milk (SRIM)/delayed onset of lactation (DOL) systematic review. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta‐analysis flow chart
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Study quality analysis: Cross‐sectional and retrospective studies (n = 62). (b) Study quality analysis: Prospective studies (n = 39). (c) Study quality analysis: Quasi‐experimental studies (n = 19). (d) Study quality analysis: Randomised controlled trials (n = 10)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Self‐reported insufficient milk (SRIM) conceptual framework. SRIM is determined by distal (socioeconomic and demographic), intermediate (social support, psychoemotional and baby behaviours, maternity ward practices, biomedical), and proximal (commercial milk formula [CMF] supplementation, and BF challenges) factors. Dotted lines indicate relationships not tested in the systematic review. DOL, delayed onset of lactation; SES, socioeconomics status
Figure 4
Figure 4
Delayed onset of lactation (DOL) conceptual framework. DOL is determined by distal (socioeconomic and demographic), intermediate (social support, maternal lifestyles, maternity ward practices and breastfeeding counselling, biomedical) and proximal (commercial milk formula (CMF) supplementation) factors. Dotted lines indicate relationships not tested in systematic review. SES, socioeconomics status
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Amine, E. K. , Al‐Awadi, F. , & Rabie, M. (1989). Infant feeding pattern and weaning practices in Kuwait. Journal of the Royal Society of Health, 109(5), 178–180. - PubMed
    1. Amir, L. H. , & Cwikel, J. (2005). Why do women stop breastfeeding? A closer look at ‘not enough milk’ among Israeli women in the Negev Region. Breastfeeding Review: Professional Publication of the Nursing Mothers' Association of Australia, 13(3), 7–13. - PubMed
    1. Amir, L. H. , & Donath, S. (2007). A systematic review of maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention, initiation and duration. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 7, 9. 10.1186/1471-2393-7-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrade Barcia, A. , & Valle Carrera, E. (1981). Breast feeding: Causes for its discontinuation in 2 cities in Ecuador. Boletin de la Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana. Pan American Sanitary Bureau, 91(5), 408–417. - PubMed
    1. Bartick, M. C. , Schwarz, E. B. , Green, B. D. , Jegier, B. J. , Reinhold, A. G. , Colaizy, T. T. , & Stuebe, A. M. (2017). Suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: Maternal and pediatric health outcomes and costs. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 13(1), e12366. 10.1111/mcn.12366 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types