Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan-Dec:18:17455057221087865.
doi: 10.1177/17455057221087865.

Re-thinking lactation-related nipple pain and damage

Affiliations
Review

Re-thinking lactation-related nipple pain and damage

Pamela Douglas. Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Nipple pain is a common reason for premature cessation of breastfeeding. Despite the benefits of breastfeeding for both infant and mother, clinical support for problems such as maternal nipple pain remains a research frontier. Maternal pharmaceutical treatments, and infant surgery and bodywork interventions are commonly recommended for lactation-related nipple pain without evidence of benefit. The pain is frequently attributed to mammary dysbiosis, candidiasis, or infant anatomic anomaly (including to diagnoses of posterior or upper lip-tie, high palate, retrognathia, or subtle cranial nerve abnormalities). Although clinical protocols universally state that improved fit and hold is the mainstay of treatment of nipple pain and wounds, the biomechanical parameters of pain-free fit and hold remain an omitted variable bias in almost all clinical breastfeeding research. This article reviews the research literature concerning aetiology, classification, prevention, and management of lactation-related nipple-areolar complex (NAC) pain and damage. Evolutionary and complex systems perspectives are applied to develop a narrative synthesis of the heterogeneous and interdisciplinary evidence elucidating nipple pain in breastfeeding women. Lactation-related nipple pain is most commonly a symptom of inflammation due to repetitive application of excessive mechanical stretching and deformational forces to nipple epidermis, dermis and stroma during milk removal. Keratinocytes lock together when mechanical forces exceed desmosome yield points, but if mechanical loads continue to increase, desmosomes may rupture, resulting in inflammation and epithelial fracture. Mechanical stretching and deformation forces may cause stromal micro-haemorrhage and inflammation. Although the environment of the skin of the nipple-areolar complex is uniquely conducive to wound healing, it is also uniquely exposed to environmental risks. The two key factors that both prevent and treat nipple pain and inflammation are, first, elimination of conflicting vectors of force during suckling or mechanical milk removal, and second, elimination of overhydration of the epithelium which risks moisture-associated skin damage. There is urgent need for evaluation of evidence-based interventions for the elimination of conflicting intra-oral vectors of force during suckling.

Keywords: biomechanics; breastfeeding; infant suck; lactation; mechanobiological model; nipple damage; nipple pain; vasospasm; white spots.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The author is Medical Director of Possums & Co. www.possumsonline.com, a charity which educates health professionals in Neuroprotective Developmental Care (NDC or ‘the Possums programs’), including in the gestalt approach to clinical breastfeeding support. Possums & Co. offers many free resources but also sells access to the Milk & Moon programmes www.milkandmoonbabies.com which provide parents with breastfeeding information and peer support, and to education resources for providers at ndceducationhub.com. The charity invests all revenue raised back into education and research which supports the well-being of mothers and babies.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The mechanobiological model of nipple epithelium yield and fracture. Graph adapted from Pawlaczyk et al.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, et al.. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet 2016; 387: 475–490. - PubMed
    1. Stuebe AM. We need patient-centered research in breastfeeding medicine. Breastfeed Med 2021; 16(4): 349–350. - PubMed
    1. Rey J. Frontier research: bringing the future closer. In: Lychnos: Notebooks of the Fundacion General CSIC (No. 5), June 2011, https://fgcsic.es/lychnos/en_en/forum/frontier_research_bringing_the_fut...
    1. Brownlee S, Chalkidou K, Doust J, et al.. Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world. Lancet 2017; 390: 156–168. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saini V, Brownlee S, Elshaug AG, et al.. Addressing overuse and underuse around the world. Lancet 2017; 390: 105–107. - PubMed

Publication types