Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Jun 1;28(11):2329-2338.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3849.

Phase II Multi-institutional Clinical Trial Result of Concurrent Cetuximab and Nivolumab in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase II Multi-institutional Clinical Trial Result of Concurrent Cetuximab and Nivolumab in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Christine H Chung et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: A phase II multi-institutional clinical trial was conducted to determine overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with a combination of cetuximab and nivolumab.

Patients and methods: Patients with R/M HNSCC were treated with cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 14 as a lead-in followed by cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. and nivolumab 240 mg i.v. on day 1 and day 15 of each 28-day cycle. Expression of p16 and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in archived tumors were determined. Tumor-tissue-modified human papillomavirus (TTMV) DNA was quantified in plasma.

Results: Ninety-five patients were enrolled, and 88 patients were evaluable for OS with a median follow-up of 15.9 months. Median OS in the 45 patients who had prior therapy for R/M HNSCC (cohort A) was 11.4 months, with a 1 year OS 50% [90% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-0.57]. Median OS in the 43 patients who had no prior therapy (cohort B) was 20.2 months, with a 1-year OS 66% (90% CI, 0.59-0.71). In the combined cohorts, the p16-negative immunostaining was associated with higher response rate (RR; P = 0.02) but did not impact survival while higher PD-L1 combined positive score was associated with higher RR (P = 0.03) and longer OS (log-rank P = 0.04). In the p16-positive patients, lower median (1,230 copies/mL) TTMV DNA counts were associated with higher RR (P = 0.01) and longer OS compared with higher median (log-rank P = 0.05).

Conclusions: The combination of cetuximab and nivolumab is effective in patients with both previously treated and untreated R/M HNSCC and warrants further evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: CHC - honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, CUE, Sanofi, Mirati, Merck, Brooklyn ImmunoTherapuetics, and Exelixis for ad hoc Scientific Advisory Board participation. CS - honoraria from Armo, Bergen Bio, Abbvie, and Lilly Oncology for ad hoc Scientific Advisory Board participation. NFS - honoraria from Pfizer, Merck, Aduro, Rakuten, CUE, and Blupoint for ad hoc Scientific Advisory Board or Data Safety Monitoring Committee and research funding Bristol-Myers Squibb and Exelixis. SK, CK, and PJS are employees of Naveris Inc. and stockholders. The other authors do not have conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Consort diagram of the clinical trial
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A) One-year overall survival (OS) of 50% with a 90% confidence interval (CI, 0.59-0.71), assuming an exponential distribution in patients with prior treatment for incurable RM HNSCC and persistent or platinum-refractory R/M HNSCC (Cohort A). The red dotted line represents 1-year OS assumption of 36%, estimated based on the historical data from programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor monotherapy. The cyan line represents the 90% lower bound. The red solid line represents the 1 year time point. B) One-year OS of 66% with a 90% confidence interval (CI, 0.59-0.71), assuming an exponential distribution in patients with no prior treatment for incurable RM HNSCC (Cohort B). The red dotted line represents 1-year OS assumption of 46%, estimated based on the historical data from PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy. The cyan line represents the 90% lower bound. The red solid line represents the 1 year time point. C) Spider plot to illustrate the best response by percent changes in tumor measures over time (Cohort B): CR - complete response, PR - partial response, SD – stable disease, and PD – progressive disease. D) Waterfall plot to illustrate the best response by percent changes in tumor measurement in each patient (Cohort B): “+” - p16-positive HNSCC. “−“ - p16-negative HNSCC. Top 7 patients with the deeper responses are p16-negative HNSCC. E) Spider plot to illustrate the baseline and subsequent changes in the tumor-tissue-modified human papillomavirus (TTMV) DNA levels in p16-positive patients (Cohort A and B): N=105 plasma samples from 36 p16-positive patients. F) Spider plot to illustrate percent changes in TTMV DNA levels in 34 p16-positive patients with available baseline TTMV DNA measurement (Cohort A and B). The best response was determined by the RECIST criteria.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Survival analyses of patients in both Cohort A and B based on biomarkers. A) Progression-free survival (PFS) and B) Overall survival (OS) comparison between p16-positive and p16-negative patients (N=88). C) PFS and D) OS comparison between patients with programed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) <1, 1-19, and ≥20 (N=79). E) PFS and F) OS comparison between >median and <median 1,230 copies/mL of TTMV DNA in p16-positive patients (N=36).

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33. - PubMed
    1. Gillison ML, Zhang Q, Jordan R, Xiao W, Westra WH, Trotti A, et al. Tobacco smoking and increased risk of death and progression for patients with p16-positive and p16-negative oropharyngeal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2102–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maier H, Dietz A, Gewelke U, Heller WD, Weidauer H. Tobacco and alcohol and the risk of head and neck cancer. Clin Investig. 1992;70:320–7. - PubMed
    1. Gillison ML, D'Souza G, Westra W, Sugar E, Xiao W, Begum S, et al. Distinct risk factor profiles for human papillomavirus type 16-positive and human papillomavirus type 16-negative head and neck cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:407–20. - PubMed
    1. D'Souza G, Kreimer AR, Viscidi R, Pawlita M, Fakhry C, Koch WM, et al. Case-control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1944–56. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms