Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;152(2):153-165.
doi: 10.1007/s11120-022-00906-x. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

Comparison of proton transfer paths to the QA and QB sites of the Rb. sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction centers

Affiliations

Comparison of proton transfer paths to the QA and QB sites of the Rb. sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction centers

Rongmei Judy Wei et al. Photosynth Res. 2022 May.

Abstract

The photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers from purple non-sulfur bacteria use light energy to drive the transfer of electrons from cytochrome c to ubiquinone. Ubiquinone bound in the QA site cycles between quinone, QA, and anionic semiquinone, QA·-, being reduced once and never binding protons. In the QB site, ubiquinone is reduced twice by QA·-, binds two protons and is released into the membrane as the quinol, QH2. The network of hydrogen bonds formed in a molecular dynamics trajectory was drawn to investigate proton transfer pathways from the cytoplasm to each quinone binding site. QA is isolated with no path for protons to enter from the surface. In contrast, there is a complex and tangled network requiring residues and waters that can bring protons to QB. There are three entries from clusters of surface residues centered around HisH126, GluH224, and HisH68. The network is in good agreement with earlier studies, Mutation of key nodes in the network, such as SerL223, were previously shown to slow proton delivery. Mutational studies had also shown that double mutations of residues such as AspM17 and AspL210 along multiple paths in the network presented here slow the reaction, while single mutations do not. Likewise, mutation of both HisH126 and HisH128, which are at the entry to two paths reduce the rate of proton uptake.

Keywords: Hydrogen bond networks; Molecular dynamics; Proton transfer; Quinone; Reaction centers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abresch EC, Paddock ML, Stowell MHB et al (1998) Identification of proton transfer pathways in the X-ray crystal structure of the bacterial reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Photosynth Res 55:119–125 - DOI
    1. Adelroth P, Paddock ML, Tehrani A et al (2001) Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: decrease of proton transfer rate by mutation of surface histidines at H126 and H128 and chemical rescue by imidazole identifies the initial proton donors. Biochemistry 40:14538–14546. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi011585s - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agmon N (1995) The Grotthuss mechanism. Chem Phys Lett 244:456–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(95)00905-J - DOI
    1. Agmon N, Bakker HJ, Campen RK et al (2016) Protons and hydroxide ions in aqueous systems. Chem Rev 116:7642–7672. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00736 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Alexov EG, Gunner MR (1999) Calculated protein and proton motions coupled to electron transfer: electron transfer from QA to QB in Bacterial Photosynthetic Reaction Centers. Biochemistry 38:8253–8270. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi982700a - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources