Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;29(38):57190-57203.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19780-0. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China

Affiliations

Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China

Ziyue Li et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

While intensive peach production has expanded rapidly in recent years, few studies have explored the environmental impacts associated with specific regional systems or the optimal management strategies to minimize associated environmental risks. Here, data from a survey of 290 native farmers were used to conduct a life cycle assessment to quantify the acidification potential (AP), global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), and reactive nitrogen (Nr) losses in peach production in Pinggu District, Beijing. Total annual Nr losses, and GWP, AP, and EP values for peach production in Pinggu District were respectively 10.7 kg N t-1, 857 kg CO2-eq t-1, 12.9 kg SO2-eq t-1, and 4.1 kg PO4-eq t-1. The principal driving factors were fertilizer production, transportation, and application, which together accounted for 94%, 67%, 75%, and 94% of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP, respectively. In the high yield, high nitrogen-use efficiency (HH) group, relative values of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP were respectively 33%, 25%, 39%, and 32% lower than the overall averages for 290 orchards. Further analyses indicate that improved farming practices such as decreasing application rates of fertilizers, increasing proportion of base fertilization rate, and proper fertilization frequency in the HH group were the main reasons for these orchards' better performance in peach yields and partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer, and their reduced environmental impacts. These results highlight the need to optimize nutrient management in peach production in order simultaneously to realize both environmental sustainability and high productivity in the peach production system.

Keywords: Environmental emission mitigation; Farming practice; Life cycle assessment; Nutrient management; Peach production; Peri-urban agriculture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alishah A, Motevali A, Tabatabaeekoloor R, Hashemi SJ (2019) Multiyear life energy and life cycle assessment of orange production in Iran. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:32432–32445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06344-y - DOI
    1. Beltran-Esteve M, Reig-Martinez E, Estruch-Guitart V (2017) Assessing eco-efficiency: a metafrontier directional distance function approach using life cycle analysis. Environ Impact Assess Rev 63:116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.01.001 - DOI
    1. Berman ME, DeJong TM (1996) Water stress and crop load effects on fruit fresh and dry weights in peach (Prunus persica). Tree Physiol 16:859–864. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/16.10.859 - DOI
    1. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 - DOI
    1. Bryla DR, Dickson E, Shenk R, Johnson RS, Crisosto CH, Trout TJ (2005) Influence of irrigation method and scheduling on patterns of soil and tree water status and its relation to yield and fruit quality in peach. Hortscience 40:2118–2124. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.7.2118 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources