Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China
- PMID: 35344146
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-19780-0
Integrating life cycle assessment and a farmer survey of management practices to study environmental impacts of peach production in Beijing, China
Abstract
While intensive peach production has expanded rapidly in recent years, few studies have explored the environmental impacts associated with specific regional systems or the optimal management strategies to minimize associated environmental risks. Here, data from a survey of 290 native farmers were used to conduct a life cycle assessment to quantify the acidification potential (AP), global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), and reactive nitrogen (Nr) losses in peach production in Pinggu District, Beijing. Total annual Nr losses, and GWP, AP, and EP values for peach production in Pinggu District were respectively 10.7 kg N t-1, 857 kg CO2-eq t-1, 12.9 kg SO2-eq t-1, and 4.1 kg PO4-eq t-1. The principal driving factors were fertilizer production, transportation, and application, which together accounted for 94%, 67%, 75%, and 94% of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP, respectively. In the high yield, high nitrogen-use efficiency (HH) group, relative values of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP were respectively 33%, 25%, 39%, and 32% lower than the overall averages for 290 orchards. Further analyses indicate that improved farming practices such as decreasing application rates of fertilizers, increasing proportion of base fertilization rate, and proper fertilization frequency in the HH group were the main reasons for these orchards' better performance in peach yields and partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer, and their reduced environmental impacts. These results highlight the need to optimize nutrient management in peach production in order simultaneously to realize both environmental sustainability and high productivity in the peach production system.
Keywords: Environmental emission mitigation; Farming practice; Life cycle assessment; Nutrient management; Peach production; Peri-urban agriculture.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Assessing the environmental impacts of organic and conventional mixed vegetable production based on the life cycle assessment approach.Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2022 Nov;18(6):1733-1746. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4609. Epub 2022 Apr 22. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2022. PMID: 35332683
-
Comparative assessment of environmental impacts, mitigation potentials, and economic benefits of rain-fed and irrigated apple production systems on China's Loess Plateau.Sci Total Environ. 2023 Apr 15;869:161791. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161791. Epub 2023 Jan 24. Sci Total Environ. 2023. PMID: 36707003
-
Menvironmental impacts of crop production systems in subtropical plateau regions: case study of Yunnan, China.Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 4;14(1):30254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80808-1. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39632970 Free PMC article.
-
Coupling the environmental impacts of reactive nitrogen losses and yield responses of staple crops in China.Front Plant Sci. 2022 Aug 19;13:927935. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.927935. eCollection 2022. Front Plant Sci. 2022. PMID: 36092406 Free PMC article.
-
Reactive nitrogen compounds and their influence on human health: an overview.Rev Environ Health. 2021 May 24;37(2):229-246. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2021-0021. Print 2022 Jun 27. Rev Environ Health. 2021. PMID: 34022126 Review.
Cited by
-
Potential mitigation of environmental impacts of intensive plum production in southeast China with maintenance of high yields: Evaluation using life cycle assessment.Front Plant Sci. 2023 Mar 22;14:1158591. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1158591. eCollection 2023. Front Plant Sci. 2023. PMID: 37035064 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alishah A, Motevali A, Tabatabaeekoloor R, Hashemi SJ (2019) Multiyear life energy and life cycle assessment of orange production in Iran. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:32432–32445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06344-y - DOI
-
- Beltran-Esteve M, Reig-Martinez E, Estruch-Guitart V (2017) Assessing eco-efficiency: a metafrontier directional distance function approach using life cycle analysis. Environ Impact Assess Rev 63:116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.01.001 - DOI
-
- Berman ME, DeJong TM (1996) Water stress and crop load effects on fruit fresh and dry weights in peach (Prunus persica). Tree Physiol 16:859–864. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/16.10.859 - DOI
-
- Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 - DOI
-
- Bryla DR, Dickson E, Shenk R, Johnson RS, Crisosto CH, Trout TJ (2005) Influence of irrigation method and scheduling on patterns of soil and tree water status and its relation to yield and fruit quality in peach. Hortscience 40:2118–2124. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.7.2118 - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources