Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov;56(6):929-933.
doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00374-w. Epub 2022 Mar 27.

Digital Health Technologies in Pediatric Trials

Affiliations
Review

Digital Health Technologies in Pediatric Trials

Leonard Sacks et al. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Advances in the miniaturization of sensors and other technologies provide opportunities to collect physiological and/or functional data directly from patients participating in clinical trials. The use of such technologies in children is particularly promising. Objective, quantifiable measurements made by these technologies, often on a continuous or frequent basis, may provide more robust data than the episodic reports from caregivers that are used in traditional pediatric trials.

Methods: We reviewed the pros and cons of these technologies for use in a variety of pediatric diseases, including seizure and neuromuscular disorders, cardiorespiratory diseases, and metabolic disorders.

Results: Correlation between sensor measurements and patient observations or traditional clinical measurements varied depending on the disease being evaluated. There was a notable dearth of reports on the use of digital health technology in pediatric patients. Given the range of sensors and measurements that can be made by DHTs, selection of the design, metrics and types of sensors best suited to disease evaluation presents challenges for adoption of these technologies in clinical trials.

Conclusion: Traditional measurements of drug effects are often deficient, particularly in the evaluation of infants and young children. The opportunity to make objective, frequent measurements may increase our power to detect and quantify responses to therapy in these populations. Further research and evaluation are needed to realize the full scientific potential of remote monitoring in pediatric clinical trials.

Keywords: Digital health technology; Drug development; FDA; Mobile technology; Pediatric; Regulatory; Wearable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

References

    1. BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Glossary. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK338448/#IX-D.
    1. Sharma A, Badea M, Tiwari S, Marty JL. Wearable Biosensors: an alternative and practical approach in healthcare and disease monitoring. molecules. 2021;26(3). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim J, Campbell AS, de Avila BE, Wang J. Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(4):389–406. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christakis DA, Johnston BD, Connell FA. Methodologic issues in pediatric outcomes research. Ambul Pediatr. 2001;1(1):59–62. - PubMed
    1. Bruno EVP, Sperling MR, et al. Seizure detection at home: do devices on the market match the needs of people living with epilepsy and their caregivers? Epilepsia. 2020;61(S1):S11–24. - PubMed