Digital Health Technologies in Pediatric Trials
- PMID: 35344202
- PMCID: PMC9622205
- DOI: 10.1007/s43441-021-00374-w
Digital Health Technologies in Pediatric Trials
Abstract
Background: Advances in the miniaturization of sensors and other technologies provide opportunities to collect physiological and/or functional data directly from patients participating in clinical trials. The use of such technologies in children is particularly promising. Objective, quantifiable measurements made by these technologies, often on a continuous or frequent basis, may provide more robust data than the episodic reports from caregivers that are used in traditional pediatric trials.
Methods: We reviewed the pros and cons of these technologies for use in a variety of pediatric diseases, including seizure and neuromuscular disorders, cardiorespiratory diseases, and metabolic disorders.
Results: Correlation between sensor measurements and patient observations or traditional clinical measurements varied depending on the disease being evaluated. There was a notable dearth of reports on the use of digital health technology in pediatric patients. Given the range of sensors and measurements that can be made by DHTs, selection of the design, metrics and types of sensors best suited to disease evaluation presents challenges for adoption of these technologies in clinical trials.
Conclusion: Traditional measurements of drug effects are often deficient, particularly in the evaluation of infants and young children. The opportunity to make objective, frequent measurements may increase our power to detect and quantify responses to therapy in these populations. Further research and evaluation are needed to realize the full scientific potential of remote monitoring in pediatric clinical trials.
Keywords: Digital health technology; Drug development; FDA; Mobile technology; Pediatric; Regulatory; Wearable.
© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to report.
References
-
- BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Glossary. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK338448/#IX-D.
-
- Christakis DA, Johnston BD, Connell FA. Methodologic issues in pediatric outcomes research. Ambul Pediatr. 2001;1(1):59–62. - PubMed
-
- Bruno EVP, Sperling MR, et al. Seizure detection at home: do devices on the market match the needs of people living with epilepsy and their caregivers? Epilepsia. 2020;61(S1):S11–24. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous