Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2044255.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2044255. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

Safety and immunogenicity of 3 formulations of a Sabin inactivated poliovirus vaccine produced on the PER.C6® cell line: A phase 2, double-blind, randomized, controlled study in infants vaccinated at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Safety and immunogenicity of 3 formulations of a Sabin inactivated poliovirus vaccine produced on the PER.C6® cell line: A phase 2, double-blind, randomized, controlled study in infants vaccinated at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age

Anna Lisa Ong-Lim et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. .

Abstract

An inactivated poliovirus vaccine candidate using Sabin strains (sIPV) grown on the PER.C6® cell line was assessed in infants after demonstrated immunogenicity and safety in adults. The study recruited 300 infants who were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive one of 3 dose levels of sIPV or a conventional IPV based on Salk strains (cIPV). Poliovirus-neutralizing antibodies were measured before the first dose and 28 days after the third dose. Reactogenicity was assessed for 7 days and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) for 28 days after each vaccination. Serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded throughout the study. Solicited AEs were mostly mild to moderate. None of the SAEs reported in the study were judged vaccine related, including one fatal SAE due to aspiration of vomitus that occurred 26 days after the third dose of low-dose sIPV. After 3 sIPV vaccinations and across all dose levels, seroconversion (SC) rates were at least 92% against Sabin poliovirus types and at least 80% against Salk types, with a dose-response in neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) observed across the 3 sIPV groups. Compared to cIPV, the 3 sIPV groups displayed similar or higher SC rates and GMTs against the 3 Sabin types but showed a lower response against Salk types 1 and 2; this was most visible for Salk type 1. While the PER.C6® cell line-based sIPV showed an acceptable safety profile and immunogenicity in infants, lower seroprotection against type 1 warrants optimization of dose level and additional clinical evaluation.

Keywords: IPV; Inactivated; PER.C6® cell line; Sabin; infants; poliovirus; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

G.Sh., A.G., M.Du., G.Sc., V.v.P., M.L.G., H.S. and M.Do. are full-time employees of the study sponsor. C.P.C. was a full-time employee of the sponsor at the time of the trial, J.-M. J. is an independent consultant under contract with the study sponsor. A.L.O.-L, M.T.-A., and D.C.-Y. have received grants from Janssen Vaccines to finance the conduct of this study in their institution. G.Sh, G.Sc, M.L.G., H.S., and A.G hold shares in Johnson & Johnson.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Disposition of participants. Notes: IPV = inactivated polio vaccine; sIPV = Sabin-IPV; LD = low dose; ID = intermediate dose; HD = high dose; cIPV = conventional Salk-IPV.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Incidence of fever after 3-dose primary vaccination. The incidence of fever in categories as indicated in green, yellow, red, black and gray, after the 1st, 2nd and 3rd immunization as well as the cumulative incidence, is shown for the different dose levels of sIPV and for cIPV. IPV = inactivated poliovirus vaccine; sIPV = Sabin-IPV; LD = low dose; ID = intermediate dose; HD = high dose; cIPV = conventional Salk-IPV.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Anti-poliovirus seroconversion rates (with 95% CI) 28 days after dose 3 – per protocol immunogenicity set. Seroconversion rates at 28 days after the 3rd immunization for Salk and Sabin virus types 1, 2 and 3 are plotted for each group. Seroconversion was determined as described in the Methods. IPV = inactivated poliovirus vaccine; sIPV = Sabin-IPV; LD = low dose; ID = intermediate dose; HD = high dose; cIPV = conventional Salk-IPV; CI = confidence interval.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Anti-poliovirus seroprotection rates (with 95% CI) 28 days post-dose 3 – per protocol immunogenicity set. Seroprotection rates at 28 days after the 3rd immunization for Salk and Sabin virus types 1, 2 and 3 are plotted for each group. Seroprotection was determined as described in the Methods. IPV = inactivated poliovirus vaccine; sIPV = Sabin-IPV; LD = low dose; ID = intermediate dose; HD = high dose; cIPV = conventional Salk-IPV; CI = confidence interval.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Anti-poliovirus geometric mean titers (with 95% CI) 28 days after dose 3 – per protocol immunogenicity set. Neutralizing antibody titers at 28 days after the 3rd immunization for Salk and Sabin virus types 1, 2 and 3 are plotted as geometric mean titers for each group. Neutralizing antibody titers were determined as described in the Methods. IPV = inactivated poliovirus vaccine; GMT = geometric mean titer; sIPV = Sabin-IPV; LD = low dose; ID = intermediate dose; HD = high dose; cIPV = conventional Salk-IPV; CI = confidence interval.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Geometric mean poliovirus-neutralizing antibody titers (with 95% CI) 28 days post-dose 3 according to pre-vaccination serostatus–per protocol immunogenicity set. Neutralizing antibody titers at 28 days after the 3rd immunization for Salk and Sabin virus types 1, 2 and 3 are plotted as geometric mean titers for each group for participants that were seronegative at baseline (open circles) or seropositive at baseline (full circles). Neutralizing antibody titers were determined as described in the Methods. IPV = inactivated poliovirus vaccine; sIPV = Sabin-IPV; LD = low dose; ID = intermediate dose; HD = high dose; cIPV = conventional Salk-IPV; CI = confidence interval; ULOQ, upper limit of quantification; SP = seroprotection threshold.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Global Polio Eradication Initiative, World Health Organization. Polio endgame strategy 2019-2023. Eradication, integration, certification and containment. [accessed 2021 June 30]. http://polioeradication.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/english-polio-end....
    1. World Health Organization . Polio vaccines: WHO position paper – March, 2016. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2016;91(12):145–11. - PubMed
    1. Chard AN, Datta SD, Tallis G, Burns CC, Wassilak SGF, Vertefeuille JF, Zaffran M.. Progress toward polio eradication — worldwide, January 2018–March 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(25):784–89. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6925a4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Global Polio Eradication Initiative . GPEI polio today WPV reports. [accessed 2021 June 30]. https://polioeradication.org/polio-today/polio-now/this-week/.
    1. Jorba J, Diop OM, Iber J, Henderson E, Zhao K, Quddus A, Sutter R, Vertefeuille JF, Wenger J, Wassilak SGF, et al. Update on vaccine-derived poliovirus outbreaks — worldwide, January 2018–June 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(45):1024–28. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6845a4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances