Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;101(5):101787.
doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101787. Epub 2022 Feb 18.

Practical opportunities for microbiome analyses and bioinformatics in poultry processing

Affiliations

Practical opportunities for microbiome analyses and bioinformatics in poultry processing

Steven C Ricke et al. Poult Sci. 2022 May.

Abstract

Poultry processing is undergoing changes both in operations as well as microbial methodologies. Traditionally, microbial data has been gathered through a series of culturing methods using liquid media and plating for isolation and enumeration. Both foodborne pathogens and nonpathogenic bacterial populations are estimated to assess food safety risks as well as the potential for spoilage. Bacterial loads from carcasses are important for estimating processing control and the effectiveness of antimicrobial applications. However, these culture-based approaches may only provide part of the microbial ecology landscape associated with chicken carcasses and the subsequent changes that occur in these populations during processing. Newer molecular-based approaches, such as 16S sequencing of the microbiota, offer a means to retrieve a more comprehensive microbial compositional profile. However, such approaches also result in large data sets which must be analyzed and interpreted. As more data is generated, this will require not only bioinformatic programs to process the data but appropriate educational forums to present the processed data to a broad audience.

Keywords: bioinformatics; education; microbiome; microbiota; poultry processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures There is no conflict of interest with any of the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the longitudinal pathway of a broiler from farm to fork. Common microbiome and biomapping sample locations, and official USDA sampling locations are labeled with a circle and star, respectively. Figure created with Biorender.com.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Brief summary of the advantages and disadvantages associated with culture-based and molecular-based approaches, as well as the potential applications for a combined approach. Figure created with Biorender.com.

References

    1. Amato K.R. An introduction to microbiome analysis for human biology applications. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2017;29:1–17. - PubMed
    1. AOAC . Association of Official Analytical Chemists; Gaithersburg, MD: 2005. Official Method 990.12: Aerobic Plate Counts in Food. Official Methods of Analysis, Eighteenth Edition.
    1. Arnaut-Rollier L., De Zutter L., Van Hoof J. Identities of the Pseudomonas spp. in flora from chilled chicken. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999;48:87–96. - PubMed
    1. Aycicek H., Oguz U., Karci K. Comparison of results of ATP bioluminescence and traditional swabbing methods for the determination of surface cleanliness of a hospital kitchen. Int. J. Hygiene Environ. Health. 2006;209:203–206. - PubMed
    1. Belk A.D., Duarte T., Quinn C., Coil D.A., Belk K.E., Eisen J.A., Quinn J.C., Martin J.N., Yang X., Metcalf J.L. Air versus water chilling of chicken: a pilot study of quality, shelf-life, microbial ecology, and economics. mSystems. 2021;6:e00912–e00920. - PMC - PubMed