Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul;49(7):471-473.
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107912. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

Preserving women's reproductive autonomy while promoting the rights of people with disabilities?: the case of Heidi Crowter and Maire Lea-Wilson in the light of NIPT debates in England, France and Germany

Affiliations
Review

Preserving women's reproductive autonomy while promoting the rights of people with disabilities?: the case of Heidi Crowter and Maire Lea-Wilson in the light of NIPT debates in England, France and Germany

Adeline Perrot et al. J Med Ethics. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

On July 2021, the UK High Court of Justice heard the Case CO/2066/2020 on the application of Heidi Crowter who lives with Down's syndrome, and Máire Lea-Wilson whose son Aidan has Down's syndrome. Crowter and Lea-Wilson, with the support of the disability rights campaign, 'Don't Screen Us Out', have been taking legal action against the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (the UK Government) for a review of the 1967 Abortion Act: the removal of section 1(1)(d) making termination of pregnancy lawful for 'severe' fetal indications detected after 24 weeks' gestation. On 23 September 2021, the High Court dismissed the claim. This action came at a time when non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was introduced into the NHS England Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme for the trisomies 21, 13 and 18. The implementation of NIPT has been heavily criticised, in particular by 'Don't Screen Us Out' campaigners, for increasing fetal selection and discrimination of people living with disabilities. The case of Crowter and Lea-Wilson echoes debates in other European countries such as in France and Germany, where the introduction of NIPT in the public healthcare system has provoked equally vehement public reactions and discussions. The comparison between these three countries allows contextualising the public discourses around NIPT and the ground for termination of pregnancy in relation to different socio-cultural and political contexts. We examine how each country, and particularly England, deals with the conflict between the principles of promoting the rights of people living with disabilities and preserving women's reproductive autonomy.

Keywords: Decision Making; Disabilities; Ethics; Genetic Counseling; Prenatal Diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Don’t Screen Us Out. . Woman with Down’s syndrome’s landmark case against UK Govt over discriminatory abortion law to be heard by High Court, 2021. Available: https://dontscreenusout.org/heidi-high-court-tues/
    1. UK National Screening Committee . UK NSC recommendation on fetal anomaly screening in pregnancy, 2016.
    1. Wulff CB, Gerds TA, Rode L, et al. . Risk of fetal loss associated with invasive testing following combined first-trimester screening for Down syndrome: a national cohort of 147,987 singleton pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47(1):38–44. 10.1002/uog.15820 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Den Bogaert K, Lannoo L, Brison N, et al. . Outcome of publicly funded nationwide first-tier noninvasive prenatal screening. Genetics in Medicine 2021;23(6):1137–42. 10.1038/s41436-021-01101-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Costa J-M, Letourneau A, Favre R, et al. . Cell-Free fetal DNA versus maternal serum screening for trisomy 21 in pregnant women with and without assisted reproduction technology: a prospective interventional study. Genet Med 2018;20(11):1346–53. 10.1038/gim.2018.4 - DOI - PubMed