Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision
- PMID: 35347302
- DOI: 10.1038/s41443-022-00553-9
Psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision
Abstract
Policy statements on penile circumcision have focused primarily on disease, dysfunction, or sensation, with relatively little consideration of psychological and psychosocial implications of the procedure. There has also been minimal consideration of potential qualitative changes in the subjective experience of sexual activity following changes in penile anatomy (foreskin removal) or associated sexual biomechanics. We present a critical overview of literature on the psychological, psychosocial, and psychosexual implications of penile circumcision. We give consideration to differences among circumcisions performed in infancy, childhood, or adulthood. We also discuss potential psychosocial effects on parents electing, or failing to elect, circumcision for their children. We propose a framework for policy considerations and future research, recognizing that cultural context is particularly salient for the narratives individuals construct around penile circumcision, including both affected individuals and medical professionals who perform the surgeries. We argue that additional attention should be paid to the potential for long-term effects of the procedure that may not be properly considered when the patient is an infant or child.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Comment in
-
Deficiencies and biases in professional understanding of the effects of childhood male genital cutting: comments on "Psychological, psychosocial and psychosexual aspects of penile circumcision" by Marcus C. Tye and Lauren Sardi.Int J Impot Res. 2023 May;35(3):249-251. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00574-4. Epub 2022 Apr 25. Int J Impot Res. 2023. PMID: 35469072 No abstract available.
-
Is it time for a time-out? Progress versus politics in studying the psychosexual implications of penile circumcision.Int J Impot Res. 2023 May;35(3):252-255. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00608-x. Epub 2022 Aug 30. Int J Impot Res. 2023. PMID: 36042356 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Academy of Pediatrics: Task Force on Circumcision. Male circumcision. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e756–85.
-
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Krieger JN, Mehta SD, Bailey RC, Agot K, Ndinya‐Achola JO, Parker C, et al. Adult male circumcision: effects on sexual function and sexual satisfaction in Kisumu, Kenya. J Sex Med. 2008;5:2610–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00979.x . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Frisch M. Author’s response to: Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect? Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:312–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr181 . - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
