Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 28;10(1):10.
doi: 10.1186/s40635-022-00434-x.

Mathematical modelling of oxygenation under veno-venous ECMO configuration using either a femoral or a bicaval drainage

Affiliations

Mathematical modelling of oxygenation under veno-venous ECMO configuration using either a femoral or a bicaval drainage

Jonathan Charbit et al. Intensive Care Med Exp. .

Abstract

Background: The bicaval drainage under veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) was compared in present experimental study to the inferior caval drainage in terms of systemic oxygenation.

Method: Two mathematical models were built to simulate the inferior vena cava-to-right atrium (IVC → RA) route and the bicaval drainage-to-right atrium return (IVC + SVC → RA) route using the following parameters: cardiac output (QC), IVC flow/QC ratio, venous oxygen saturation, extracorporeal pump flow (QEC), and pulmonary shunt (PULM-Shunt) to obtain pulmonary artery oxygen saturation (SPAO2) and systemic blood oxygen saturation (SaO2).

Results: With the IVC → RA route, SPAO2 and SaO2 increased linearly with QEC/QC until the threshold of the IVC flow/QC ratio, beyond which the increase in SPAO2 reached a plateau. With the IVC + SVC → RA route, SPAO2 and SaO2 increased linearly with QEC/QC until 100% with QEC/QC = 1. The difference in required QEC/QC between the two routes was all the higher as SaO2 target or PULM-Shunt were high, and occurred all the earlier as PULM-Shunt were high. The required QEC between the two routes could differ from 1.0 L/min (QC = 5 L/min) to 1.5 L/min (QC = 8 L/min) for SaO2 target = 90%. Corresponding differences of QEC for SaO2 target = 94% were 4.7 L/min and 7.9 L/min, respectively.

Conclusion: Bicaval drainage under ECMO via the IVC + SVC → RA route gave a superior systemic oxygenation performance when both QEC/QC and pulmonary shunt were high. The VV-V ECMO configuration (IVC + SVC → RA route) might be an attractive rescue strategy in case of refractory hypoxaemia under VV ECMO.

Keywords: Bicaval drainage; Oxygenation determinants; Oxygenation performance; Pulmonary shunt; Rescue therapy; Structural recirculation; Superior cava drainage; Superior cava shunt; Triple cannulation; VV-V configuration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Modelling of the IVC → RA and IVC + SVC → RA routes. IVC inferior vena cava, RA right atrium, SaO2 arterial blood oxygen saturation, SPAO2 pulmonary arterial blood oxygen saturation, SPREO2 blood oxygen saturation in the drainage cannula(s), SVC superior vena cava
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between SaO2 and SPAO2 according to pulmonary shunt. When lung function is optimal (PULM-Shunt=0%), SaO2 is equal to 100% regardless the SPAO2 value. In contrast when residual lung function is null (PULM-Shunt=100%), SaO2 is equal to SPAO2. Between these two clinical status, the relationship SaO2 * PULM-Shunt is linear with a slope that directly depends on SPAO2. The SPAO2 value is the final consequence of ECMO therapy in term of oxygenation. PULM-Shunt pulmonary shunt, SaO2 arterial blood oxygen saturation, SPAO2 pulmonary arterial blood oxygen saturation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Oxygenation performance of the IVC → RA and IVC + SVC → RA routes. Beyond QEC/Qc = 1 using the IVC+SVC → RA route, QEff reaches the Qc value and cannot increase further. QEC increases then due to structural recirculation. IVC inferior vena cava, PULM-Shunt pulmonary shunt, QEC extracorporeal pump flow, QEff effective extracorporeal pump flow, QC cardiac output, RA right atrium, SaO2 arterial blood oxygen saturation, SPAO2 pulmonary arterial blood oxygen saturation, “SvO2 mixed venous blood oxygen saturation, SVC superior vena cava
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Required QEC to reach target SaO2. IVC inferior vena cava, PULM-Shunt pulmonary shunt, QEC extracorporeal pump flow, QC cardiac output, RA right atrium, SaO2 arterial blood oxygen saturation, SVC superior vena cava
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Reduction in required QEC from the IVC → RA route to the IVC + SVC → RA route. IVC inferior vena cava, PULM-Shunt pulmonary shunt, QEC extracorporeal pump flow, QC cardiac output, RA right atrium, SaO2 arterial blood oxygen saturation, SVC superior vena cava
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Changing the configuration from VV ECMO to VV-V ECMO. After clamping the 2 initial cannulas, tubings can be cut in conserving some length. An Y-piece connector is then positioned to reunite these 2 tubings. This Y-piece is also connected to the drainage tubing of ECMO system. Oxygenator used in V-V configuration may be conserved or changed if its performance is too altered. All tubings must be totally purged of air before connection. A complementary tubing may be necessary on return line between ECMO system and returning cannula if oxygenator is conserved. Once totally purged of air, returning cannula may be connected to the ECMO system and VV-V extracorporeal circulation may be started. In our experience, the femoral/jugular couples (29Fr–55 cm)/(22Fr–15 cm) and (27Fr–61 cm)/(20Fr–15 cm) have good balance in term of drainage, with flow percentages frequently comprised between 60%/40% and 70%/30%, respectively

References

    1. Papazian L, Aubron C, Brochard L, et al. Formal guidelines: management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;13:69. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0540-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmidt M, Pham T, Arcadipane A, et al. Mechanical ventilation management during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. An international multicenter prospective cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200:1002–1012. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201806-1094OC. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peek G, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, et al., CESAR trial collaboration (2009) Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374: 1351–1363. - PubMed
    1. Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, et al. EOLIA Trial Group, REVA, and ECMONet: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1965–1975. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800385. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmidt M, Tachon G, Devilliers C, et al. Blood oxygenation and decarboxylation determinants during venovenous ECMO for respiratory failure in adults. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:838–846. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2785-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources