Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 11;29(6):1091-1100.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac036.

Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes

Traber D Giardina  1 , Debra T Choi  1 , Divvy K Upadhyay  2 , Saritha Korukonda  2 , Taylor M Scott  1 , Christiane Spitzmueller  3 , Conrad Schuerch  2 , Dennis Torretti  2 , Hardeep Singh  1
Affiliations

Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes

Traber D Giardina et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: The 21st Century Cures Act mandates patients' access to their electronic health record (EHR) notes. To our knowledge, no previous work has systematically invited patients to proactively report diagnostic concerns while documenting and tracking their diagnostic experiences through EHR-based clinician note review.

Objective: To test if patients can identify concerns about their diagnosis through structured evaluation of their online visit notes.

Methods: In a large integrated health system, patients aged 18-85 years actively using the patient portal and seen between October 2019 and February 2020 were invited to respond to an online questionnaire if an EHR algorithm detected any recent unexpected return visit following an initial primary care consultation ("at-risk" visit). We developed and tested an instrument (Safer Dx Patient Instrument) to help patients identify concerns related to several dimensions of the diagnostic process based on notes review and recall of recent "at-risk" visits. Additional questions assessed patients' trust in their providers and their general feelings about the visit. The primary outcome was a self-reported diagnostic concern. Multivariate logistic regression tested whether the primary outcome was predicted by instrument variables.

Results: Of 293 566 visits, the algorithm identified 1282 eligible patients, of whom 486 responded. After applying exclusion criteria, 418 patients were included in the analysis. Fifty-one patients (12.2%) identified a diagnostic concern. Patients were more likely to report a concern if they disagreed with statements "the care plan the provider developed for me addressed all my medical concerns" [odds ratio (OR), 2.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-4.87) and "I trust the provider that I saw during my visit" (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.19-3.71) and agreed with the statement "I did not have a good feeling about my visit" (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.09-2.01).

Conclusion: Patients can identify diagnostic concerns based on a proactive online structured evaluation of visit notes. This surveillance strategy could potentially improve transparency in the diagnostic process.

Keywords: OpenNotes; communication; diagnostic errors; patient experience; patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2015. - PubMed
    1. Graber M, Gordon R, Franklin N. Reducing diagnostic errors in medicine: what’s the goal? Acad Med 2002; 77 (10): 981–92. https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2002/10000/Reducing_D... Accessed August 10, 2020. - PubMed
    1. McGlynn EA, McDonald KM, Cassel CK. Measurement is essential for improving diagnosis and reducing diagnostic error: a report from the institute of medicine. JAMA 2015; 314 (23): 2501–2. - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Graber ML, Hofer TP. Measures to improve diagnostic safety in clinical practice. J Patient Saf 2019; 15 (4): 311–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell SK, Delbanco T, Elmore JG, et al. Frequency and types of patient-reported errors in electronic health record ambulatory care notes. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (6): e205867. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types