Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;112(S2):S159-S165.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306808.

Drug Consumption Rooms: Welfare State and Diversity in Social Acceptance in Denmark and in France

Affiliations

Drug Consumption Rooms: Welfare State and Diversity in Social Acceptance in Denmark and in France

Esben Houborg et al. Am J Public Health. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Drug consumption rooms (DCRs) have the potential to have a positive impact on the opioid overdose crisis. DCRs could also potentially change the political environment for public health because they can affect the distribution of responsibility for harm reduction between the individual and society by collectivizing responsibility for harm reduction through welfare regimes. The methodology is based on 2 case studies-1 in Copenhagen, Denmark, and 1 in Paris, France-about residents, people who inject drugs (PWID), and politicians' experiences of DCRs involving semidirective interviews. Denmark has a long history of harm-reduction policy, and the implementation of DCRs in Copenhagen has happened through close collaboration between local authorities and the local community. France is far more centralized and paternalistic in terms of the distribution of authority and decision-making in welfare and drug policy. Difficulties in cohabitation between local residents and PWID happened in both countries and can sometimes make public authorities hesitate to implement DCRs because of the NIMBY ("not in my backyard") phenomenon. However, the Danish and French case studies show that DCRs have the potential to become an instrument for civic cohabitation as well as to contribute to the destigmatization and health of PWID. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S2):S159-S165. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306808).

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Milloy MJ, Wood E. Emerging role of supervised injecting facilities in human immunodeficiency virus prevention. Addiction. 2009;104(4):620–621. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02541.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kerr T, Tyndall M, Li K, Montaner J, Wood E. Safer injection facility use and syringe sharing in injection drug users. Lancet. 2005;366(9482):316–318. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66475-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kinnard EN, Howe CJ, Kerr T, Hass VS, Marshall BDL. Self-reported changes in drug use behaviors and syringe disposal methods following the opening of a supervised injecting facility in Copenhagen, Denmark. Harm Reduct J. 2014;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-11-29. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Milloy M-JS, Kerr T, Tyndall M, Montaner J, Wood E. Estimated drug overdose deaths averted by North America’s first medically-supervised safer injection facility. PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003351. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salmon AM, Van Beek I, Amin J, Kaldor J, Maher L. Impact of supervised injecting facility on ambulance call-outs in Sydney. Australia. Addiction. 2010;105(4):676–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02837.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources