Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul;40(3):247-251.
doi: 10.12701/jyms.2022.00129. Epub 2022 Mar 30.

Effects of propofol-remifentanil versus sevoflurane-remifentanil on acute postoperative pain after total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized trial

Affiliations

Effects of propofol-remifentanil versus sevoflurane-remifentanil on acute postoperative pain after total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized trial

Eun Kyung Choi et al. J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Background: While some evidence indicates that propofol-based anesthesia has less postoperative pain than sevoflurane-based anesthesia, these results are controversial. We compared acute postoperative pain intensity and opioid consumption after total shoulder arthroplasty between propofol-remifentanil (PR) and sevoflurane-remifentanil (SR) anesthesia.

Methods: Among 48 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery anesthetized with PR or SR, postoperative pain intensity was assessed at 30 minutes and at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours. The total patient-controlled analgesia volume and number of patients requiring rescue analgesics were assessed.

Results: No significant difference in postoperative pain intensity was observed between the two groups. Postoperative opioid consumption and analgesic requirements were also comparable in the first 24 hours after surgery.

Conclusion: PR and SR anesthesia for shoulder arthroscopic surgery provide comparable postoperative analgesia results.

Keywords: Anesthesia; Propofol; Sevoflurane; Total shoulder arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wu CL, Raja SN. Treatment of acute postoperative pain. Lancet. 2011;377:2215–25. - PubMed
    1. Cheng SS, Yeh J, Flood P. Anesthesia matters: patients anesthetized with propofol have less postoperative pain than those anesthetized with isoflurane. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:264–9. - PubMed
    1. Li M, Mei W, Wang P, Yu Y, Qian W, Zhang ZG, et al. Propofol reduces early post-operative pain after gynecological laparoscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:368–75. - PubMed
    1. Fassoulaki A, Melemeni A, Paraskeva A, Siafaka I, Sarantopoulos C. Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements after anesthesia with sevoflurane, desflurane or propofol. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1715–9. - PubMed
    1. Pokkinen SM, Yli-Hankala A, Kalliomäki ML. The effects of propofol vs. sevoflurane on post-operative pain and need of opioid. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58:980–5. - PubMed