Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 22;10(3):e4208.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004208. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Preventing Infection in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: Evaluating the Evidence for Common Practices and Standardized Protocols

Affiliations

Preventing Infection in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: Evaluating the Evidence for Common Practices and Standardized Protocols

Nusaiba F Baker et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Infection following implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) results in increased rates of hospital readmission, reoperation, patient and hospital expenses, and reconstructive failure. IBBR is a complex, multistep procedure, and there is a relative lack of high-quality plastic surgery evidence regarding "best practices" in the prevention of implant infections. In the absence of strong data, standardizing procedures based on available evidence can reduce error and improve efficacy and outcomes.

Methods: We performed a focused literature review of the available evidence supporting specific interventions for infection prevention in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care that are applicable to IBBR. In addition, we examined previously published standardized perioperative protocols for implant reconstruction.

Results: Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative planning and organization is crucial in IBBR. Preoperative planning involves skin decolonization in advance of surgery with either chlorhexidine gluconate or mupirocin. Intraoperative methods that have shown potential benefit include double-gloving, breast pocket irrigation, separate closing instruments, and the utilization of "no-touch" techniques. In the postoperative period, the duration of drain removal and postoperative antibiotic administration play an important role in the prevention of surgical site infection.

Conclusions: There is a crucial need to establish an evidence-based set of "best practices" for IBBR, and there exists a paucity of evidence in the breast literature. These data can be utilized to develop a standardized protocol as part of a rigorous quality improvement methodology.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2020. Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Available at https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2020/plastic-su.... Accessed February 23, 2022.
    1. Gabriel SE, Woods JE, O’Fallon WM, et al. Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:677–682. - PubMed
    1. Brand KG. Infection of mammary prostheses: a survey and the question of prevention. Ann Plast Surg. 1993;30:289–295. - PubMed
    1. Olsen MA, Nickel KB, Fox IK, et al. Incidence of surgical site infection following mastectomy with and without immediate reconstruction using private insurer claims data. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36:907–914. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dassoulas KR, Wang J, Thuman J, et al. Reducing infection rates in implant-based breast reconstruction: impact of an evidence-based protocol. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80:493–499. - PubMed