An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals' understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education
- PMID: 35351106
- PMCID: PMC8962069
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03265-2
An exploration of primary care healthcare professionals' understanding of pain and pain management following a brief pain science education
Abstract
Background: Persistent pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide yet implementation of clinical guidelines that recommend a biopsychosocial approach remains a challenge in clinical practise. Limited pain understanding amongst clinicians may be partly responsible for this.
Purpose of the study: 1) Qualitatively explore the experience of receiving PSE, understanding of PSE and operationalisation of PSE-related principles in routine clinical practice. 2) Quantitatively explore pain knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours of general practitioners (GPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) before and after pain science education (PSE).
Methods: An exploratory, single-site, mixed-methods study in north-east England. Fifteen NPs/GPs completed questionnaires and a case-vignette before and after a 70-min face-to-face PSE lecture. Qualitative data were thematically analysed from two focus groups after the intervention.
Results: Clinicians' relatively high prior levels of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour were similar after PSE. Qualitative themes described facilitation of self-reflection on pain management behaviours, and difficulties in operationalising PSE principles in practise including: limited patient rapport; short appointment times; patients' passive and often oppositional biomedical treatment expectations; and clinicians' lack of readily understandable language to communicate with patients.
Conclusion: The findings highlight the value of PSE perceived by these clinicians who were already favourably inclined towards biopsychosocial pain management. They sought more resources for their personal learning and for communication with patients. Even with such favourable disposition, the practicalities and environment of clinical practice impeded the operationalisation of PSE-related principles.
Trial registration: This study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov ( NCT04587596 ) in October 2020.
Keywords: GPs; Mixed-methods; Nurse practitioners; Pain education.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
'Treated as a number, not treated as a person': a qualitative exploration of the perceived barriers to effective pain management of patients with chronic pain.BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 12;7(6):e016454. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016454. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28606909 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare professionals' experiences of delivering pain science education to adults from ethnically minoritised groups.Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2024 Nov;74:103196. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103196. Epub 2024 Sep 27. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2024. PMID: 39388805
-
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 27820153
-
Pain science education for children living with and beyond cancer: Challenges and research agenda.Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Aug;69(8):e29783. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29783. Epub 2022 May 20. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35593047 Review.
-
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Biopsychosocial Pain Education upon Health Care Professional Pain Attitudes, Knowledge, Behavior and Patient Outcomes.J Pain. 2022 Jan;23(1):1-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jul 6. J Pain. 2022. PMID: 34237464
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of a pain science education programme in middle school students: a randomised controlled trial.Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 22;12:1423716. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1423716. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 39911778 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Health care utilization patterns of patients enrolled in an interdisciplinary program for back pain.N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jan 14;21:100584. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100584. eCollection 2025 Mar. N Am Spine Soc J. 2025. PMID: 40026325 Free PMC article.
-
What does collaborative healthcare for people with musculoskeletal-related conditions look like? A scoping review.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08814-6. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025. PMID: 40615996 Free PMC article.
-
From didactic explanations to co-design, sequential art and embodied learning: challenges, criticisms and future directions of patient pain education.Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 May 9;6:1536112. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1536112. eCollection 2025. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40417376 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advancing pain education: a cross-sectional study in the Portuguese medical schools.BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 16;25(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06582-w. BMC Med Educ. 2025. PMID: 39819780 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gatchel RJ, Turk DC, editors. Psychological approaches to pain management: a practitioners handbook. New York: The Guildford Press; 2002.
-
- Hall AM, Scurrey SR, Pike AE, Albury C, Richmond HL, Matthews J, Toomey E, Hayden JA, Etchegary H. Physician-reported barriers to using evidence-based recommendations for low back pain in clinical practice: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2019;14:49. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0884-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Chronic pain (primary and secondary) in over 16s: assessment of all chronic pain and management of chronic primary pain (NICE guideline NG193) 2021. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials