Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 29;12(3):e058126.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058126.

Identifying actions to foster cross-disciplinary global health research: a mixed-methods qualitative case study of the IMPALA programme on lung health and tuberculosis in Africa

Yan Ding  1 , Ewan M Tomeny  2 , Imelda Bates  3 ; IMPALA Consortium
Collaborators, Affiliations

Identifying actions to foster cross-disciplinary global health research: a mixed-methods qualitative case study of the IMPALA programme on lung health and tuberculosis in Africa

Yan Ding et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To identify actions for fostering cross-disciplinary research (CDR) skills and collaborations in global health, and to produce recommendations for improving the design, implementation and management of cross-disciplinary global health research programmes.

Design: Using a North-South global health research programme as a case study-and following an adapted framework-we conducted qualitative research using document reviews, semi-structured interviews (purposive sampling) and participatory observation. We used baseline survey findings to identify potential interviewees and tailor interview guides.

Setting: Our case study was a 4.5-year (2017-2021) programme, namely, the International Multidisciplinary Programme to Address Lung Health and Tuberculosis in Africa (IMPALA). Led by a UK research institute, IMPALA spanned 22 partner organisations from 13 countries (10 in sub-Saharan Africa), and involved five research discipline groups: clinical science, social science, health systems, health economics and policy/research capacity.

Participants: Thirty-one IMPALA members were interviewed (July 2018-November 2019), with interviewees evenly split by gender (16 female and 15 male) and by Global North/South institution (15 non-African and 16 African). Twenty-five (81%) were researchers, comprising 18 senior researchers (professors, readers, associate professors and senior lecturers) and seven early career researchers (assistant professors, lecturers, research fellows, postdocs, research assistants and PhD students). Twenty-four programme events were observed (September 2018-April 2020) and 49 documents were reviewed (December 2017-April 2020). All 66 IMPALA staff were sent the baseline survey, receiving 51 responses (43/56 researchers and 8/10 non-researchers).

Results: Fourteen themes emerged, which suggested that CDR-while valued by many-is not universally understood, and the time it requires is often underestimated. We found that fostering CDR and managing tensions needs planning and continuous discussions and interactions. A shared vision with explicitly agreed goals and roles and active management of cross-disciplinary activities is essential.

Conclusions: Active planning, implementation and management of cross-disciplinary activities are essential for the success of cross-disciplinary global health research and should be separate from the primary research activities.

Keywords: Anthropology; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The International Multidisciplinary Programme to Address Lung Health and Tuberculosis in Africa organogram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The three-component framework for the cross-disciplinary collaborative research process used in this study (adapted from9).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, et al. . Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet 2009;373:1993–5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60332-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stipelman BA, et al. . Mapping the impact of Transdisciplinary research: a visual comparison of investigator-initiated and team-based tobacco use research publications. Journal of Translational Medicine & Epidemiology 2014;2 https://cns.iu.edu/docs/publications/2014-stipelman-mappingimpact.pdf
    1. Ding Y, Pulford J, Bates I. Practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary global health research: lessons from a narrative literature review. BMJ Glob Health 2020;5:e002293. 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002293 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zscheischler J, Rogga S. Transdisciplinarity in land use science – a review of concepts, empirical findings and current practices. Futures 2015;65:28–44. 10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.005 - DOI
    1. O'Rourke M, Crowley S, Gonnerman C. On the nature of cross-disciplinary integration: a philosophical framework. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 2016;56:62–70. 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.10.003 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types