Channelling the force of audit and feedback: averting the dark side

Eilidh M Duncan¹, Noah M Ivers^{2

3}, Jeremy M Grimshaw^{4

5}

Affiliations

¹ Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
² Family Practice Health Centre, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
³ Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
⁴ Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada jgrimshaw@ohri.ca.
⁵ Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Editorial

Eilidh M Duncan et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Oct.

. 2022 Oct;31(10):695-697.

doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014520. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

Eilidh M Duncan¹, Noah M Ivers^{2

3}, Jeremy M Grimshaw^{4

5}

¹ Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
² Family Practice Health Centre, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
³ Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
⁴ Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada jgrimshaw@ohri.ca.
⁵ Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

No abstract available

Keywords: Audit and feedback; Implementation science; Quality improvement; Report cards; Social sciences.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy.
Catlow J, Bhardwaj-Gosling R, Sharp L, Rutter MD, Sniehotta FF. Catlow J, et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Oct;31(10):704-715. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013588. Epub 2021 Dec 10. BMJ Qual Saf. 2022. PMID: 34893545 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.