Menthol versus non-menthol flavouring and switching to e-cigarettes in black and Latinx adult menthol combustible cigarette smokers: secondary analyses from a randomised clinical trial
- PMID: 35351805
- PMCID: PMC10246471
- DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057180
Menthol versus non-menthol flavouring and switching to e-cigarettes in black and Latinx adult menthol combustible cigarette smokers: secondary analyses from a randomised clinical trial
Abstract
Background: As the US Food and Drug Administration takes regulatory action on menthol cigarettes, debate continues about how restricting menthol e-liquids might impact adult menthol smokers in switching to e-cigarettes.
Methods: Switching patterns and e-cigarette acceptability were assessed at week 6 among 64 black and Latinx menthol cigarette smokers who used JUUL menthol (n=39) or non-menthol e-cigarettes ((n=25), primarily mint or mango) as part of a randomised switching trial.
Results: No clear evidence of effects was found between menthol versus non-menthol e-cigarettes on use or subjective effects/acceptability, effect sizes for all comparisons were small (effect size=0.0-0.2), and Bayes factor ranged from 0.10 to 0.15. Specifically, 82.1% of participants who used menthol-flavoured e-cigarettes fully or partially switched to e-cigarettes compared with 88.0% of participants who used a non-menthol (p=0.75). Further, both groups demonstrated substantial reductions in cigarettes per day (menthol e-cigarettes: -8.5±10.4 vs non-menthol e-cigarettes: -8.8±5.8, p=0.87), comparable grams of e-liquid consumed (menthol e-cigarettes: 9.2±9.8 g vs non-menthol e-cigarettes: 11.0±11.0 g, p=0.47), and positive subjective effects, including 'just right' throat hit (menthol e-cigarettes: 70.7% vs non-menthol e-cigarettes: 66.7%, p=0.93) and flavour liking (menthol e-cigarettes: 75.6% vs non-menthol e-cigarettes: 66.7%, p=0.32).
Conclusions: Both menthol and non-menthol e-cigarettes were associated with high rates of use and acceptability among menthol smokers. Findings require confirmation in a fully powered non-inferiority or equivalence study but provide preliminary evidence to inform regulatory action on menthol e-cigarettes that could slow youth initiation without impacting black and Latinx menthol cigarette smokers interested in switching to e-cigarettes.
Trial registration number: NCT03511001.
Keywords: Disparities; Electronic nicotine delivery devices; Harm Reduction; Public policy.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: JA received sponsored funds for travel expenses as a speaker for the 2021 annual GTNF conference. He also serves as a consultant, and has equity, in a start-up company Respira Technologies.
Similar articles
-
Effect of Pod e-Cigarettes vs Cigarettes on Carcinogen Exposure Among African American and Latinx Smokers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2026324. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26324. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33206193 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
"It is the One Thing that has Worked": facilitators and barriers to switching to nicotine salt pod system e-cigarettes among African American and Latinx people who smoke: a content analysis.Harm Reduct J. 2021 Sep 16;18(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00543-y. Harm Reduct J. 2021. PMID: 34530834 Free PMC article.
-
Should menthol e-cigarettes be banned? Reaction of adult smokers and users of e-cigarettes to hypothetical bans.Tob Control. 2024 Mar 19;33(e1):e125-e127. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057439. Tob Control. 2024. PMID: 36446577 Free PMC article.
-
A review and assessment of menthol employed as a cigarette flavoring ingredient.Food Chem Toxicol. 2010 Jan;48 Suppl 2:S1-38. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.11.002. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010. PMID: 20113860 Review.
-
Tobacco use behaviors in response to menthol restriction: A scoping review.Tob Induc Dis. 2025 Feb 28;23. doi: 10.18332/tid/200694. eCollection 2025. Tob Induc Dis. 2025. PMID: 40026696 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Menthol versus tobacco e-liquid flavor: Impact on acute subjective effects, puff patterns, and intentions for use among Black and White menthol smokers.Addict Behav. 2024 Aug;155:108038. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108038. Epub 2024 Apr 12. Addict Behav. 2024. PMID: 38613857 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of Nicotine Content and Preferred Flavor on Subjective Responses to E-cigarettes: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Laboratory Study.Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Feb 22;26(3):307-315. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad143. Nicotine Tob Res. 2024. PMID: 37539752 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Flavoured Vaping Products in Tobacco Harm Reduction: A Regulatory Perspective.Cureus. 2025 Aug 1;17(8):e89196. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89196. eCollection 2025 Aug. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40757083 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub8. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1:CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9. PMID: 38189560 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
The Scientific Basis for the Regulation of Flavors in Tobacco Products.Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2024 Jul;20(1):381-406. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080921-075624. Epub 2024 Jul 2. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38346292 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials