Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd edition
- PMID: 35352103
- PMCID: PMC9715291
- DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac036
Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd edition
Abstract
Aims: Decision makers in public health practice and policy rely on access to trustworthy, relevant, synthesized evidence. The second edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions ('the Handbook') reflects a major revision in guidance for authors of systematic reviews, incorporating a decade of methodological development and a number of significant changes to previous recommendations. This paper aims to highlight new guidance that addresses a number of key methodological challenges for authors of systematic reviews in public health.
Results: The revised Handbook includes guidance on framing public health research questions for synthesis, considering equity, intervention complexity, risk of bias assessment and synthesis methods other than meta-analysis. Reviews of public health interventions frequently encounter the types of methodological complexity addressed in this new guidance.
Conclusion: We hope that readers will find that the Cochrane Handbook includes detailed and thoughtful guidance on both conceptualizing and executing systematic reviews relevant to public health questions. Considering the available methods guidance will, we hope, provide support for authors of public health reviews to tackle the challenges they encounter, strengthen their analysis and provide useful answers to the important questions asked by stakeholders and users of public health evidence.
Keywords: methods; public health; systematic review.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Aug 5;19(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0804-y. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019. PMID: 31382898 Free PMC article.
-
Methodological guidance for incorporating equity when informing rapid-policy and guideline development.J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:142-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Jul 19. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 35863618 Free PMC article.
-
In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance.J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;106:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 9. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 30312657 Review.
-
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 37131927 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Bimanual motor impairments in older adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.EXCLI J. 2022 Aug 16;21:1068-1083. doi: 10.17179/excli2022-5236. eCollection 2022. EXCLI J. 2022. PMID: 36381648 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of hypoglycemic events on cognitive function in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a dose-response meta-analysis.Front Neurol. 2024 Aug 13;15:1394499. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1394499. eCollection 2024. Front Neurol. 2024. PMID: 39193149 Free PMC article.
-
The potential of IFN-λ, IL-32γ, IL-6, and IL-22 as safeguards against human viruses: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.Front Immunol. 2024 Feb 14;15:1303115. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1303115. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 38420119 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Thermal Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in AF: A Broad Overview Focusing on Efficacy, Safety and Outcomes.Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2024 Aug 22;13:e13. doi: 10.15420/aer.2024.05. eCollection 2024. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2024. PMID: 39221061 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Application of e-health on neonatal intensive care unit discharged preterm infants and their parents: Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.Digit Health. 2023 Oct 9;9:20552076231205271. doi: 10.1177/20552076231205271. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 37822959 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization . WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, 2nd edn. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018.
-
- NICE . Developing NICE Guidelines: The Manual. 2020. https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg20/chapter/introduction (20 September 2021, date last accessed)
-
- National Health and Medical Research Council . Guidelines for Guidelines Manual. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council, 2021.
-
- Cochrane . Cochrane COVID reviews. 2021. https://covidreviews.cochrane.org/ (20 September 2021, date last accessed).
-
- Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, 2008.