Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;279(11):5113-5121.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07351-5. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

Retrograde mastoidectomy with canal wall reconstruction versus intact canal wall tympanomastoidectomy for cholesteatoma with minimal mastoid extension

Affiliations

Retrograde mastoidectomy with canal wall reconstruction versus intact canal wall tympanomastoidectomy for cholesteatoma with minimal mastoid extension

Masaomi Motegi et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Appropriate reconstruction of the canal wall or maintenance of the middle ear pressure in cholesteatoma may help in preventing recurrence. Retrograde mastoidectomy with canal wall reconstruction (RMR) can overcome the challenge of a wider canal wall defect or temporal bone immaturity, which possibly increases the recurrence risk. This study compared the outcomes of RMR and intact canal wall tympanomastoidectomy (ICW) for cholesteatomas with minimal mastoid extension and quantitatively evaluate the relationship between anatomical features and recurrence.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients who had undergone primary ICW or RMR for pars flaccida cholesteatoma with minimal mastoid extension from 2009 to 2019. The main outcome measures were anatomical measurements of the shortest distance between the cranial fossa and the upper canal wall (SCU), attic volume, and bony defect area of the canal wall (BDC) on computed tomography; recidivism; and postoperative air-bone gap (ABG).

Results: There were no significant differences in the preoperative anatomical factors, recidivism incidence, and postoperative ABG between the RMR (n = 20) and ICW (n = 60) groups. However, the median BDC was significantly greater in the RMR group (58.3 vs. 37.0 mm2). There was no significant difference in the SCU and attic volume between patients with and without recurrence.

Conclusion: Selection of RMR or ICW may not affect recidivism and hearing outcomes in cholesteatoma with minimal mastoid extension. Bony defect size and attic narrowness were not associated with recurrence. Considering wider visualization and one-staged operation, RMR can be more adaptable than ICW for cholesteatoma with minimal mastoid extension.

Keywords: Canal wall reconstruction; Cholesteatoma; Hearing outcome; Intact canal wall tympanomastoidectomy; Recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Arriaga MA (1994) Cholesteatoma in children. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 27:573–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-6665(20)30670-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hirsch BE, Kamerer DB, Doshi S (1992) Single-stage management of cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 106:351–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459989210600406 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schuring AG, Lippy WH, Rizer FM, Schuring LT (1990) Staging for cholesteatoma in the child, adolescent, and adult. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 99:256–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949009900402 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dornhoffer JL (2000) Retrograde mastoidectomy with canal wall reconstruction: a single-stage technique for cholesteatoma removal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109:1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940010901108 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gehrking E (2010) Osteoplastic atticoantrotomy with autologous bone chips and a bony attic strut in cholesteatoma surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:1055–1066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1171-9 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources