Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;37(Suppl 2):230-236.
doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01481-8. Epub 2022 Mar 30.

Vector Angle Analysis of Multimodal Neuromonitoring Data for Continuous Prediction of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia

Affiliations

Vector Angle Analysis of Multimodal Neuromonitoring Data for Continuous Prediction of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia

Murad Megjhani et al. Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Dysfunctional cerebral autoregulation often precedes delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Currently, there are no data-driven techniques that leverage this information to predict DCI in real time. Our hypothesis is that information using continuous updated analyses of multimodal neuromonitoring and cerebral autoregulation can be deployed to predict DCI.

Methods: Time series values of intracranial pressure, brain tissue oxygenation, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), optimal CPP (CPPOpt), ΔCPP (CPP - CPPOpt), mean arterial pressure, and pressure reactivity index were combined and summarized as vectors. A validated temporal signal angle measurement was modified into a classification algorithm that incorporates hourly data. The time-varying temporal signal angle measurement (TTSAM) algorithm classifies DCI at varying time points by vectorizing and computing the angle between the test and reference time signals. The patient is classified as DCI+ if the error between the time-varying test vector and DCI+ reference vector is smaller than that between the time-varying test vector and DCI- reference vector. Finally, prediction at time point t is calculated as the majority voting over all the available signals. The leave-one-patient-out cross-validation technique was used to train and report the performance of the algorithms. The TTSAM and classifier performance was determined by balanced accuracy, F1 score, true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative over time.

Results: One hundred thirty-one patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who underwent multimodal neuromonitoring were identified from two centers (Columbia University: 52 [39.7%], Aachen University: 79 [60.3%]) and included in the analysis. Sixty-four (48.5%) patients had DCI, and DCI was diagnosed 7.2 ± 3.3 days after hemorrhage. The TTSAM algorithm achieved a balanced accuracy of 67.3% and an F1 score of 0.68 at 165 h (6.9 days) from bleed day with a true positive of 0.83, false positive of 0.16, true negative of 0.51, and false negative of 0.49.

Conclusions: A TTSAM algorithm using multimodal neuromonitoring and cerebral autoregulation calculations shows promise to classify DCI in real time.

Keywords: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage; Cerebral autoregulation; Classification; Machine learning; Neurocritical care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

Please confirm the authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Framework of the classification algorithm. a Workflow diagram describing the steps to classify DCI. b Visualization of the angle analysis algorithm, comparing the test patient’s data (in blue) with the reference DCI+ (red) and reference DCI− (green). The TTSAM classifies the patient as DCI+ if the total error between the test vectors and DCI+ reference vectors is smaller than that between the test vectors and DCI− reference vectors. ABP mean arterial pressure, CPP cerebral perfusion pressure, CPPOpt optimal cerebral perfusion pressure, DCI delayed cerebral ischemia, ICP intracranial pressure, PbtO2 brain tissue oxygenation, PRx pressure reactivity index, TTSAM time-varying temporal signal angle measurement, ΔCPP CPP – CPPOpt.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Performance of the angle analysis approach. a True positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN), and false negative (FN) of the proposed algorithm. b Balanced accuracy of the proposed algorithm was consistently over 60% starting at 105 h after the bleed day

References

    1. Dorsch NW. Therapeutic approaches to vasospasm in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002;8(2):128–33. - PubMed
    1. Suarez JI. Diagnosis and management of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2015;21:1263–87. 10.1212/CON.0000000000000217. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rowland MJ, Hadjipavlou G, Kelly M, Westbrook J, Pattinson KT. Delayed cerebral ischaemia after subarachnoid haemorrhage: looking beyond vasospasm. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(3):315–29. 10.1093/bja/aes264. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Francoeur CL, Mayer SA. Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):277. 10.1186/s13054-016-1447-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lai X, Zhang W, Ye M, Liu X, Luo X. Development and validation of a predictive model for the prognosis in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Clin Lab Anal. e23542. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources