Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Oct;129(11):1805-1816.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17164. Epub 2022 Apr 15.

Birthweight and isolated congenital heart defects - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Moska Aliasi  1 , Maartje C Snoep  1 , Nan van Geloven  2 , Monique C Haak  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Birthweight and isolated congenital heart defects - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Moska Aliasi et al. BJOG. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Birthweight (BW) is an important prognostic factor in newborns with congenital heart defects (CHD).

Objectives: To give an overview of the literature on BW z-score in children with isolated CHD.

Search strategy: A systematic search was performed on isolated CHD and BW in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, COCHRANE Library and Emcare.

Selection criteria: Neonates with isolated CHD were included if a BW percentile, BW z-score or % small-or-gestational age (SGA) was reported.

Data collection and analysis: BW z-score and percentage SGA were pooled with random-effect meta-analysis. Quality and risk of bias were assessed using the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale.

Main results: Twenty-three articles (27 893 cases) were included. BW z-scores were retrieved from 11 articles, resulting in a pooled z-score of -0.20 (95% CI -0.50 to 0.11). The overall pooled prevalence of SGA <10th percentile was 16.0% (95% CI 11.4-20.5; 14 studies). Subgroup analysis of major CHD showed similar results (BW z-score -0.23 and percentage SGA 16.2%).

Conclusions: Overall BW in isolated CHD is within range of normality but impaired, with a 1.6-fold higher risk of SGA, irrespective of the type of CHD (major CHD vs all CHD combined). Our findings underline the association between CHD and BW. The use of BW z-scores provides insight into growth of all fetuses with CHD.

Tweetable abstract: Infants with a congenital heart defect (CHD) have a lower birthweight z-score and a higher incidence of small-for-gestational age (<10th percentile). This was encountered both in the major CHD-group as well as in all-CHD combined group analysis. Future research on the association between birthweight and CHD should include all types of CHDs (including mild cardiac defects) and placental-related disease, such as pre-eclampsia. We advocate the use of international standardised fetal growth and birthweight charts in CHD research.

Keywords: birthweight; congenital heart defects; fetal growth; intrauterine growth; meta-analysis; small for gestational age; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared. Completed disclosure of interest forms are available to view online as supporting information..

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart of included studies
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) Forest plot of the birthweight z‐score of all congenital heart defects combined. *The z‐score was adjusted for infant sex, origin, major extracardiac malformation, categories of infant syndromes, maternal prepregnancy BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, parity, smoking, age, care of high‐risk pregnancy and birth year. (B) Forest plot of percentage small‐for‐gestational age in all congenital heart defects combined with the 10th birthweight percentile as threshold for cut‐off. CI, confidence interval; RE, random effects; SGA, small‐for‐gestational age
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
(A) Forest plot of the birthweight z‐score of major congenital heart defects. *The z‐score adjusted for infant sex, origin, major extracardiac malformation, categories of infant syndromes, maternal prepregnancy BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, parity, smoking, age, care of high‐risk pregnancy and birth year. (B) Forest plot of percentage small‐for‐gestational age in major congenital heart defects with the 10th birthweight percentile as threshold for cut‐off. CI, confidence interval; RE, random effects; SGA, small‐for‐gestational age
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(12):1890–900. - PubMed
    1. van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA, Witsenburg M, Helbing WA, Takkenberg JJ, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(21):2241–7. - PubMed
    1. Roncancio CP, Misnaza SP, Pena IC, Prieto FE, Cannon MJ, Valencia D. Trends and characteristics of fetal and neonatal mortality due to congenital anomalies, Colombia 1999‐2008. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(13):1748–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilboa SM, Salemi JL, Nembhard WN, Fixler DE, Correa A. Mortality resulting from congenital heart disease among children and adults in the United States, 1999 to 2006. Circulation. 2010;122(22):2254–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marino BS, Lipkin PH, Newburger JW, Peacock G, Gerdes M, Gaynor JW, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: evaluation and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;126(9):1143–72. - PubMed