Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 30;24(3):e32994.
doi: 10.2196/32994.

Synthesizing Dimensions of Digital Maturity in Hospitals: Systematic Review

Affiliations

Synthesizing Dimensions of Digital Maturity in Hospitals: Systematic Review

Rhona Duncan et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Digital health in hospital settings is viewed as a panacea for achieving the "quadruple aim" of health care, yet the outcomes have been largely inconclusive. To optimize digital health outcomes, a strategic approach is necessary, requiring digital maturity assessments. However, current approaches to assessing digital maturity have been largely insufficient, with uncertainty surrounding the dimensions to assess.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the current dimensions used to assess the digital maturity of hospitals.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted of peer-reviewed literature (published before December 2020) investigating maturity models used to assess the digital maturity of hospitals. A total of 29 relevant articles were retrieved, representing 27 distinct maturity models. The articles were inductively analyzed, and the maturity model dimensions were extracted and consolidated into a maturity model framework.

Results: The consolidated maturity model framework consisted of 7 dimensions: strategy; information technology capability; interoperability; governance and management; patient-centered care; people, skills, and behavior; and data analytics. These 7 dimensions can be evaluated based on 24 respective indicators.

Conclusions: The maturity model framework developed for this study can be used to assess digital maturity and identify areas for improvement.

Keywords: capability model; digital capability; digital hospitals; digital maturity; eHealth; electronic medical records; literature review; maturity model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Consolidated Digital Maturity Model Framework for Hospitals.

References

    1. Johnston DS. Digital maturity: are we ready to use technology in the NHS? Future Healthc J. 2017 Oct;4(3):189–192. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.4-3-189. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/31098469 futurehealth - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eden R, Burton-Jones A, Casey V, Draheim M. Digital Transformation Requires Workforce Transformation. MISQE. 2019 Mar 1;18(1):1–17. doi: 10.17705/2msqe.00005. - DOI
    1. Krey M. Key challenges to enabling IT in healthcare. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics; October 2016; Chicago, IL, USA. IEEE Int Conf Healthc Inform: IEEE; 2016. Dec 08, pp. 328–33. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cresswell K, Sheikh A, Krasuska M, Heeney C, Franklin BD, Lane W, Mozaffar H, Mason K, Eason S, Hinder S, Potts HWW, Williams R. Reconceptualising the digital maturity of health systems. The Lancet Digital Health. 2019 Sep;1(5):e200–e201. doi: 10.1016/s2589-7500(19)30083-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eden R, Burton-Jones A, Scott I, Staib A, Sullivan C. Effects of eHealth on hospital practice: synthesis of the current literature. Aust Health Rev. 2018 Sep;42(5):568–578. doi: 10.1071/AH17255.AH17255 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types