Adapting a conceptual framework to engage diverse stakeholders in genomic/precision medicine research
- PMID: 35353945
- PMCID: PMC9327871
- DOI: 10.1111/hex.13486
Adapting a conceptual framework to engage diverse stakeholders in genomic/precision medicine research
Abstract
Introduction: Genomic/precision medicine offers a remarkable opportunity to improve health and address health disparities. Genomic medicine is the study of genes and their interaction with health. Precision medicine is an approach to disease prevention and treatment that considers individual variability in genes, environment and lifestyle. Conclusions from studies lacking diversity may hinder generalizability as genomic variation occurs within and between populations. Historical factors, such as medical mistrust, ethical issues related to decision making, and data sharing pose complex challenges that may further widen inequities in genomic/precision medicine if not appropriately addressed. Although few biomedical studies integrate priorities of community partners into their conceptual framework, effective implementation of genomic/precision medicine research calls for the involvement of diverse stakeholders to expand traditional unidirectional models of engagement in clinical research towards authentic bidirectional collaboration.
Methods: A multipronged approach was used integrating an evidence-based literature review and best practices in developing and evaluating the engagement of diverse stakeholders in genomic and precision medicine research. This was combined with expert consensus building to adapt a conceptual model from a community engagement framework to addressing genomics to be scalable to engagement science, which is challenging to genomic/precision medicine research.
Results: The final enhanced conceptual framework is composed of four overarching dimensions now inclusive of domains in trust, exploitation, discrimination, privacy risk, stigmatization, prior harms/injustices, failure to recognize coexisting governments, intersectionality and research transformation. This conceptual framework proposes effective participant research engagement strategies for upstream relationship building, distinct from downstream recruitment strategies in which the goal is enrolment.
Conclusion: To further shape the evolution of genomic/precision medicine research, it is important to leverage existing partnerships, engage participants beyond recruitment and embrace diverse perspectives.
Patient or public contribution: In preparation of this manuscript, the perspectives of the community partners on the impact of engaging in genomic/precision medicine research beyond research participation were integrated into this conceptual framework from various guided listening sessions held in diverse communities.
Keywords: conceptual framework; genomics; precision medicine; stakeholder engagement.
© 2022 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Engaging indigenous partners in health service transformation: a framework for sustained engagement built on trust.Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 13;11(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00721-3. Res Involv Engagem. 2025. PMID: 40361206 Free PMC article.
-
The Genomic Medicine Integrative Research Framework: A Conceptual Framework for Conducting Genomic Medicine Research.Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Jun 6;104(6):1088-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 May 16. Am J Hum Genet. 2019. PMID: 31104772 Free PMC article.
-
Laying Anchor: Inserting Precision Health into a Public Health Genetics Policy Course.Healthcare (Basel). 2018 Aug 3;6(3):93. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6030093. Healthcare (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30081448 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies for research participant engagement: A synthetic review and conceptual framework.Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):457-465. doi: 10.1177/17407745211011068. Epub 2021 May 20. Clin Trials. 2021. PMID: 34011179 Review.
-
Community engagement strategies for genomic studies in Africa: a review of the literature.BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Apr 12;16:24. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0014-z. BMC Med Ethics. 2015. PMID: 25889051 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
How should communities be meaningfully engaged (if at all) when setting priorities for biomedical research? Perspectives from the biomedical research community.BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Feb 6;24(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00879-5. BMC Med Ethics. 2023. PMID: 36747191 Free PMC article.
-
Bridging the Divide: A Review on the Implementation of Personalized Cancer Medicine.J Pers Med. 2024 May 24;14(6):561. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060561. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 38929782 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Integrating participants as partners in research governance and operations: an approach from the All of Us Research Program Engagement Core.BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 27;13(11):e068100. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068100. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 38011981 Free PMC article. Review.
-
LGBTQ+ Perspectives on Conducting Genomic Research on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.Behav Genet. 2022 Sep;52(4-5):246-267. doi: 10.1007/s10519-022-10105-y. Epub 2022 May 26. Behav Genet. 2022. PMID: 35614288 Free PMC article.
-
Precision Rehabilitation: Optimizing Function, Adding Value to Health Care.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep;103(9):1883-1884. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.04.017. Epub 2022 Jun 9. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022. PMID: 35690092 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Committee to Review the Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine . The CTSA Program at NIH: Opportunities for Advancing Clinical and Translational Research. National Academies Press; 2013. - PubMed
-
- National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) . Genomic Medicine and Health Care. Accessed January 20, 2022. https://www.genome.gov/27527652/genomic-medicine-and-health-care/
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources