Challenges in Interpreting the Ob/Gyn Literature: Studies of Screening
- PMID: 35354158
- DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000704
Challenges in Interpreting the Ob/Gyn Literature: Studies of Screening
Abstract
Screening tests are critical to patient care. Screening tests must meet ten criteria established by the World Health Organization in order to be considered effective. Common types of studies on screening tests include those that establish test characteristics, such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, as well as cost-effective analyses. In this paper, we review the criteria for effective screening tests, and discuss the strengths and pitfalls of common study designs evaluating screening tests.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Wilson J, Jungner G. Public Health Papers: Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1968. Available at: www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp . Accessed December 1, 2021.
-
- Goodman A. HPV testing as a screen for cervical cancer. BMJ. 2015;350:h2372.
-
- Abu-Rustum NR, Yashar CM, Bean S, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: cervical cancer, version 1.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18:660–666.
-
- Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, et al. Cervical cancer, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17:64–84.
-
- Numnum TM, Kirby TO, Leath CA, et al. A prospective evaluation of “see and treat” in women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy? J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005;9:2–6.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
