Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 30;20(1):102.
doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02541-1.

Evaluation of the learning curve for conformal sphincter preservation operation in the treatment of ultralow rectal cancer

Hai-Bo Ding #  1 , Lin-Hui Wang #  2 , Ge Sun #  1   3 , Guan-Yu Yu #  1 , Xian-Hua Gao  1 , Kuo Zheng  1 , Hai-Feng Gong  1 , Jin-Ke Sui  1 , Xiao-Ming Zhu  1 , Wei Zhang  4
Affiliations

Evaluation of the learning curve for conformal sphincter preservation operation in the treatment of ultralow rectal cancer

Hai-Bo Ding et al. World J Surg Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: To investigate the learning curve of conformal sphincter preservation operation (CSPO) in the treatment of ultralow rectal cancer and to further explore the influencing factors of operation time.

Methods: From August 2011 to April 2020, 108 consecutive patients with ultralow rectal cancer underwent CSPO by the same surgeon in the Department of Colorectal Surgery of Changhai Hospital. The moving average and cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) curve were used to analyze the learning curve. The preoperative clinical baseline data, postoperative pathological data, postoperative complications, and survival data were compared before and after the completion of learning curve. The influencing factors of CSPO operation time were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results: According to the results of moving average and CUSUM method, CSPO learning curve was divided into learning period (1-45 cases) and learning completion period (46-108 cases). There was no significant difference in preoperative clinical baseline data, postoperative pathological data, postoperative complications, and survival data between the two stages. Compared with the learning period, the operation time (P < 0.05), blood loss (P < 0.05), postoperative flatus and defecation time (P < 0.05), liquid diet time (P < 0.05), and postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.05) in the learning completion period were significantly reduced, and the difference was statistically significant. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that distance of tumor from anal verge (≥ 4cm vs. < 4cm, P = 0.039) and T stage (T3 vs. T1-2, P = 0.022) was independent risk factors for prolonging the operation time of CSPO.

Conclusions: For surgeons with laparoscopic surgery experience, about 45 cases of CSPO are needed to cross the learning curve. At the initial stage of CSPO, beginners are recommended to select patients with ultralow rectal cancer whose distance of tumor from anal verge is less than 4 cm and tumor stage is less than T3 for practice, which can enable beginners to reduce the operation time, accumulate experience, build self-confidence, and shorten the learning curve on the premise of safety.

Keywords: Conformal sphincter preservation operation; Learning curve; Operation time; Ultralow rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Moving average curve of CSPO operation time. →The first lowest point of the moving average curve
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CUSUM curve of CSPO operation time. │Vertical line through CUSUM curve cutoff point
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Learning curve flow chart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nissan A, Guillem JG, Paty PB, Wong WD, Minsky B, Saltz L, et al. Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer at a specialty center. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(1):27–35. doi: 10.1007/BF02234816. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krishnamurty DM, Blatnik J, Mutch M. Stoma complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30(03):193–200. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598160. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG. Quality of life with a temporary stoma: ileostomy vs. colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(5):650–655. doi: 10.1007/BF02235581. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yau T, Watkins D, Cunningham D, Barbachano Y, Chau I, Chong G. Longitudinal assessment of quality of life in rectal cancer patients with or without stomas following primary resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(4):669–677. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819eb970. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zolciak A, Bujko K, Kepka L, Oledzki J, Rutkowski A, Nowacki MP. Abdominoperineal resection or anterior resection for rectal cancer: patient preferences before and after treatment. Color Dis. 2006;8(7):575–580. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01000.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources