Generated temperatures and thermal laser damage during upper tract endourological procedures using the holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser: a systematic review of experimental studies
- PMID: 35355103
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03992-7
Generated temperatures and thermal laser damage during upper tract endourological procedures using the holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser: a systematic review of experimental studies
Abstract
Purpose: To perform a review on the latest evidence related to generated temperatures during Ho:YAG laser use, and present different tools to maintain decreased values, and minimize complication rates during endourological procedures.
Methods: We performed a literature search using PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials-CENTRAL, restricted to original English-written articles, including animal, artificial model, and human studies. Different keywords were URS, RIRS, ureteroscopy, percutaneous, PCNL, and laser.
Results: Thermal dose (t43) is an acceptable tool to assess possible thermal damage using the generated temperature and the time of laser exposure. A t43 value of more than 120 min leads to a high risk of thermal tissue injury and at temperatures higher than 43 °C Ho:YAG laser use becomes hazardous due to an exponentially increased cytotoxic effect. Using open continuous flow, or chilled irrigation, temperatures remain lower than 45 °C. By utilizing high-power (> 40 W) or shorter laser pulse, temperatures rise above the accepted threshold, but adding a ureteral access sheath (UAS) helps to maintain acceptable values.
Conclusions: Open irrigation systems, chilled irrigation, UASs, laser power < 40 W, and shorter on/off laser activation intervals help to keep intrarenal temperatures at accepted values during URS and PCNL.
Keywords: Laser; PCNL; Percutaneous; RIRS; URS; Ureteroscopy.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Herrmann TR, Liatsikos EN, Nagele U, Traxer O, Merseburger AS (2012) EAU guidelines on laser technologies. Eur Urol 61(4):783–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.010 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Schmidt-Kloiber H, Reichel E, Schöffmann H (1985) Laserinduced shock-wave lithotripsy (LISL). Biomed Tech (Berl) 30(7–8):173–181. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmte.1985.30.7-8.173 - DOI
-
- Hofmann R, Hartung R (1988) Use of pulsed Nd:YAG laser in the ureter. Urol Clinics N Am 15(3):369–375 - DOI
-
- Adkins WC, Dulabon DA, Chorazy ZJ, Lund PS, Johnson LM, Jones WV (1994) Consider Ho:YAG for low-cost, effective laser lithotripsy. Clin Laser Mon 12(9):139–141 - PubMed
-
- Larizgoitia I, Pons JM (1999) A systematic review of the clinical efficacy and effectiveness of the holmium:YAG laser in urology. BJU Int 84(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00096.x - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
