Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;22(3):319-331.
doi: 10.1007/s12311-022-01398-0. Epub 2022 Mar 30.

Cerebellar noninvasive neuromodulation influences the reactivity of the contralateral primary motor cortex and surrounding areas: a TMS-EMG-EEG study

Affiliations

Cerebellar noninvasive neuromodulation influences the reactivity of the contralateral primary motor cortex and surrounding areas: a TMS-EMG-EEG study

Rocchi L et al. Cerebellum. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Understanding cerebellar-cortical physiological interactions is of fundamental importance to advance the efficacy of neurorehabilitation strategies for patients with cerebellar damage. Previous works have aimed to modulate this pathway by applying transcranial electrical or magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the cerebellum and probing the resulting changes in the primary motor cortex (M1) excitability with motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). While these protocols produce changes in cerebellar excitability, their ability to modulate MEPs has produced inconsistent results, mainly due to the MEP being a highly variable outcome measure that is susceptible to fluctuations in the excitability of M1 neurons and spinal interneurons. To overcome this limitation, we combined TMS with electroencephalography (EEG) to directly record TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) and oscillations from the scalp. In three sessions, we applied intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), cathodal direct current stimulation (c-DC) or sham stimulation to modulate cerebellar activity. To assess the effects on M1 and nearby cortex, we recorded TMS-EEG and MEPs before, immediately after (T1) and 15 min (T2) following cerebellar neuromodulation. We found that cerebellar iTBS immediately increased TMS-induced alpha oscillations and produced lasting facilitatory effects on TEPs, whereas c-DC immediately decreased TMS-induced alpha oscillations and reduced TEPs. We also found increased MEP following iTBS but not after c-DC. All of the TMS-EEG measures showed high test-retest repeatability. Overall, this work importantly shows that cerebellar neuromodulation influences both cortical and corticospinal physiological measures; however, they are more pronounced and detailed when utilizing TMS-EEG outcome measures. These findings highlight the advantage of using TMS-EEG over MEPs when assessing the effects of neuromodulation.

Keywords: Brain oscillations; Cerebellum; Electroencephalography; Motor cortex; TMS-EEG; Transcranial evoked potentials; Transcranial magnetic stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ito M, Itō M. The Cerebellum and Neural Control. Raven Press; 1984.
    1. Kelly RM, Strick PL. Cerebellar Loops with Motor Cortex and Prefrontal Cortex of a Nonhuman Primate. J Neurosci. 2003;23:8432–44. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Daskalakis ZJ, Paradiso GO, Christensen BK, Fitzgerald PB, Gunraj C, Chen R. Exploring the connectivity between the cerebellum and motor cortex in humans: Mechanisms of cerebellar inhibition. J Physiol. 2004;557:689–700. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Galea JM, Jayaram G, Ajagbe L, Celnik P. Modulation of Cerebellar Excitability by Polarity-Specific Noninvasive Direct Current Stimulation. J Neurosci. 2009;29:9115–22. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Iwata N, Ugawa Y. The effects of cerebellar stimulation on the motor cortical excitability in neurological disorders: A review. The Cerebellum. 2005;4:218–23. - PubMed - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources