Cerebellar noninvasive neuromodulation influences the reactivity of the contralateral primary motor cortex and surrounding areas: a TMS-EMG-EEG study
- PMID: 35355218
- DOI: 10.1007/s12311-022-01398-0
Cerebellar noninvasive neuromodulation influences the reactivity of the contralateral primary motor cortex and surrounding areas: a TMS-EMG-EEG study
Abstract
Understanding cerebellar-cortical physiological interactions is of fundamental importance to advance the efficacy of neurorehabilitation strategies for patients with cerebellar damage. Previous works have aimed to modulate this pathway by applying transcranial electrical or magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the cerebellum and probing the resulting changes in the primary motor cortex (M1) excitability with motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). While these protocols produce changes in cerebellar excitability, their ability to modulate MEPs has produced inconsistent results, mainly due to the MEP being a highly variable outcome measure that is susceptible to fluctuations in the excitability of M1 neurons and spinal interneurons. To overcome this limitation, we combined TMS with electroencephalography (EEG) to directly record TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) and oscillations from the scalp. In three sessions, we applied intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), cathodal direct current stimulation (c-DC) or sham stimulation to modulate cerebellar activity. To assess the effects on M1 and nearby cortex, we recorded TMS-EEG and MEPs before, immediately after (T1) and 15 min (T2) following cerebellar neuromodulation. We found that cerebellar iTBS immediately increased TMS-induced alpha oscillations and produced lasting facilitatory effects on TEPs, whereas c-DC immediately decreased TMS-induced alpha oscillations and reduced TEPs. We also found increased MEP following iTBS but not after c-DC. All of the TMS-EEG measures showed high test-retest repeatability. Overall, this work importantly shows that cerebellar neuromodulation influences both cortical and corticospinal physiological measures; however, they are more pronounced and detailed when utilizing TMS-EEG outcome measures. These findings highlight the advantage of using TMS-EEG over MEPs when assessing the effects of neuromodulation.
Keywords: Brain oscillations; Cerebellum; Electroencephalography; Motor cortex; TMS-EEG; Transcranial evoked potentials; Transcranial magnetic stimulation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
The correspondence between EMG and EEG measures of changes in cortical excitability following transcranial magnetic stimulation.J Physiol. 2021 Jun;599(11):2907-2932. doi: 10.1113/JP280966. Epub 2021 Mar 5. J Physiol. 2021. PMID: 33599980
-
Cortical mechanisms underlying variability in intermittent theta-burst stimulation-induced plasticity: A TMS-EEG study.Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Oct;132(10):2519-2531. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.06.021. Epub 2021 Jul 24. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021. PMID: 34454281
-
Effects of continuous theta burst stimulation on contralateral primary motor cortex: a concurrent TMS-EEG study.J Neurophysiol. 2024 Nov 1;132(5):1530-1540. doi: 10.1152/jn.00320.2024. Epub 2024 Oct 23. J Neurophysiol. 2024. PMID: 39441211 Clinical Trial.
-
Measuring Brain Stimulation Induced Changes in Cortical Properties Using TMS-EEG.Brain Stimul. 2015 Nov-Dec;8(6):1010-20. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.07.029. Epub 2015 Jul 17. Brain Stimul. 2015. PMID: 26275346 Review.
-
Cerebral Cortical Activity Following Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation-a Systematic Review of Combined TMS and EEG Studies.Cerebellum. 2020 Apr;19(2):309-335. doi: 10.1007/s12311-019-01093-7. Cerebellum. 2020. PMID: 31907864
Cited by
-
Simultaneous transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation boost gamma oscillations in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 12;12(1):19391. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23040-z. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36371451 Free PMC article.
-
Real-time cortical dynamics during motor inhibition.Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 3;14(1):7871. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57602-0. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38570543 Free PMC article.
-
Localized Theta-Burst Magnetic Stimulation Induces Bidirectional Neural Modulation in the Mouse Auditory Cortex In Vivo.eNeuro. 2025 May 14;12(5):ENEURO.0577-24.2025. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0577-24.2025. Print 2025 May. eNeuro. 2025. PMID: 40246552 Free PMC article.
-
Cerebellar Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: A Frontier in Chronic Pain Therapy.J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 23;14(7):675. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070675. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 39063929 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of 52 weeks of precuneus rTMS in Alzheimer's disease patients: a randomized trial.Alzheimers Res Ther. 2025 Apr 2;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13195-025-01709-7. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2025. PMID: 40176122 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Ito M, Itō M. The Cerebellum and Neural Control. Raven Press; 1984.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources