Early versus delayed antiretroviral therapy based on genotypic resistance test: Results from a large retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 35355293
- PMCID: PMC9321101
- DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27754
Early versus delayed antiretroviral therapy based on genotypic resistance test: Results from a large retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Rapid start of antiretroviral therapy (ART) pending genotypic resistance test (GRT) has been recently proposed, but the effectiveness of this strategy is still debated. The rate of virological success (VS), defined as HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ml, with and without GRT was compared in drug-naïve individuals enrolled in the Italian ARCA cohort who started ART between 2015 and 2018. 521 individuals started ART: 397 without GRT (pre-GRT group) and 124 following GRT (post-GRT group). Overall, 398 (76%) were males and 30 (6%) were diagnosed with AIDS. In the pre-GRT group, baseline CD4+ cell counts were lower (p < 0.001), and viral load was higher (p < 0.001) than in the post-GRT group. The estimated probability of VS in pre-GRT versus post-GRT group was 72.54% (CI95 : 67.78-76.60) versus 66.94% (CI95 : 57.53-74.26) at Week 24 and 92.40% (CI95 : 89.26-94.62) versus 92.92% (CI95 : 86.35-96.33) at Week 48, respectively (p = 0.434). At Week 48, VS was less frequent among individuals with baseline CD4+ cell counts <200 versus >500 (90.33% vs. 97.33%), log viral load <5.00 versus >5.70 log10 cps/ml (97.17% vs 78.16%; p < 0.001), and those treated with protease inhibitors or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors versus those treated with integrase strand transfer inhibitors (p < 0.001). The rate of VS does not seem to be affected by an early ART initiation pending GRT results, but it could be influenced by the composition of the ART regimen, as well as immuno-virological parameters.
Keywords: HIV; early start; first-line antiretroviral treatment; genotypic-tesistance test; rapid ART.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Medical Virology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Virological Outcome After Choice of Antiretroviral Regimen Guided by Proviral HIV-1 DNA Genotyping in a Real-Life Cohort of HIV-Infected Patients.AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2020 Feb;34(2):51-58. doi: 10.1089/apc.2019.0198. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2020. PMID: 32049556
-
Utility of repeat genotypic resistance testing and clinical response in patients with three class resistance and virologic treatment failure.AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2007 Aug;21(8):544-50. doi: 10.1089/apc.2006.0156. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2007. PMID: 17711379
-
A longitudinal analysis of healthcare costs after treatment optimization following genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing: does resistance testing pay off?Antivir Ther. 2006;11(3):305-14. Antivir Ther. 2006. PMID: 16759046 Clinical Trial.
-
[Consensus document of Gesida and Spanish Secretariat for the National Plan on AIDS (SPNS) regarding combined antiretroviral treatment in adults infected by the human immunodeficiency virus (January 2012)].Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2012 Jun;30(6):e1-89. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 May 23. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2012. PMID: 22633764 Spanish.
-
Study of the impact of HIV genotypic drug resistance testing on therapy efficacy.Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2001;63(5):447-73. Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2001. PMID: 11813503 Review.
Cited by
-
Patterns of Transmitted Drug Resistance Mutations and HIV-1 Subtype Dynamics in ART-Naïve Individuals in Veneto, Italy, from 2017 to 2024.Viruses. 2024 Aug 30;16(9):1393. doi: 10.3390/v16091393. Viruses. 2024. PMID: 39339869 Free PMC article.
References
-
- EACS, Guideline Version 6 – October 2011; 2011. https://www.eacsociety.org/files/2011_eacsguidelines‐v6.1‐english_nov.pdf
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials