Comparison of nine methods of immediate breast reconstruction after resection of localized breast cancer: A cost-effectiveness Markov decision analysis of prospective studies
- PMID: 35355320
- DOI: 10.1002/micr.30882
Comparison of nine methods of immediate breast reconstruction after resection of localized breast cancer: A cost-effectiveness Markov decision analysis of prospective studies
Abstract
Background: Women undergoing immediate breast reconstruction without radiation therapy have reconstruction methods available with uncertain long-term costs associated with complications requiring surgery and revisions. We evaluated cost-effectiveness of nine methods of immediate breast reconstruction for women with localized breast cancer.
Methods: Markov modeling was performed over 10-years for unilateral/bilateral breast reconstructions from healthcare/societal perspectives. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched to derive data from 13,744 patients in 79 prospective studies. Complications requiring surgery (mastectomy necrosis, total/partial flap necrosis, seroma, hematoma, infection, wound dehiscence, abdominal hernia, implant removal/explantation) and revisions (fat necrosis, capsular contracture, asymmetry, scars/redundant tissue, implant rupture/removal, fat grafting) were evaluated over yearly cycles. Reconstructions included: direct-to-implant (DTI), tissue expander-to-implant (TEI), latissimus dorsi flap-to-implant (LDI), latissimus dorsi (LD), pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM), free TRAM, deep inferior epigastric perforator/superficial inferior epigastric artery (DIEP/SIEA), thigh-based, or gluteal based flaps. Outcomes were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) and net monetary benefits (NMB). Willingness-to-pay thresholds were $50,000 and $100,000.
Results: From a healthcare perspective for unilateral reconstruction, compared to LD, the ICER for DTI was -$42,109.35/quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), LDI was -$25,300.83/QALY, TEI was -$22,036.02/QALY, DIEP/SIEA was $8307.65/QALY, free TRAM was $8677.26/QALY, pedicled TRAM was $13,021.44/QALY, gluteal-based was $17,698.99/QALY, and thigh-based was $23,447.82/QALY. NMB of DIEP/SIEA was $404,523.47, free TRAM was $403,821.40, gluteal-based was $392,478.64, thigh-based was $387,691.70, pedicled TRAM was $376,901.83, LD was $370,646.93, DTI was $339,668.77, LDI was $334,350.30, and TEI was $329,265.84.
Conclusions: All nine methods of immediate breast reconstruction were considered cost-effective from healthcare/societal perspectives. LD provided the lowest costs, while DIEP/SIEA provided the greatest effectiveness and NMB.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.JAMA Surg. 2018 Oct 1;153(10):901-908. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1687. JAMA Surg. 2018. PMID: 29926077 Free PMC article.
-
Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Feb;141(2):271-281. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004016. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018. PMID: 29019862 Free PMC article.
-
Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Abdominally Based Flaps: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019 Oct;35(8):594-601. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688719. Epub 2019 May 10. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019. PMID: 31075801
-
Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):576-84. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000400. Ann Plast Surg. 2016. PMID: 25536199
-
Is Unipedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Obsolete Owing to Superiority of DIEP Flap?Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;80(6S Suppl 6):S418-S420. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001319. Ann Plast Surg. 2018. PMID: 29369109 Review.
Cited by
-
Updates on Breast Reconstruction: Surgical Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions.World J Oncol. 2024 Dec;15(6):853-870. doi: 10.14740/wjon1935. Epub 2024 Oct 6. World J Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39697427 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Markov models for clinical decision-making in radiation oncology: A systematic review.J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Aug;68(5):610-623. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13656. Epub 2024 May 20. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38766899 Free PMC article.
-
Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix: Have We Come Full Circle?J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 1;12(10):1619. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101619. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 36294758 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abdalla, H. M., Shalaan, M. A., Fouad, F. A., & Elsayed, A. A. (2006). Immediate breast reconstruction with expander assisted latissimus dorsi flap after skin sparing mastectomy. Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 18, 134-140.
-
- Adooq Bioscience. (2019). Indocyanine green (Vol. 2021). Adooq Bioscience.
-
- Allergan Inc. (2020a). Natrelle breast reconstruction (Vol. 2021). Allergan Inc.
-
- Allergan Inc. (2020b). Revolve advanced adipose system (Vol. 2021). Allergan Inc.
-
- Allergan Inc. (2020c). Alloderm™ regenerative tissue matrix (Vol. 2021). Allergan Inc.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials