Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 19;9(4):ofac045.
doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac045. eCollection 2022 Apr.

The Incidence of Ocular Complications in Candidemic Patients and Implications for the Practice of Routine Eye Exams

Molly Hillenbrand  1 , Angelico Mendy  2 , Kavya Patel  3 , Racheal Wilkinson  3 , Siyun Liao  4 , Jamie Robertson  3 , Senu Apewokin  3
Affiliations

The Incidence of Ocular Complications in Candidemic Patients and Implications for the Practice of Routine Eye Exams

Molly Hillenbrand et al. Open Forum Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Ocular candidiasis is a known complication of candidemia. Given the poor ocular penetration of echinocandins, there is some concern that the increasing use of echinocandins may portend an increased incidence of ophthalmic complications. We examined the changing trends in antifungal prescribing patterns and the incidence of ophthalmic complications after candidemia.

Methods: Patients with blood cultures positive for Candida species between January 2014 and June 2020 who underwent screening fundoscopic examination by an ophthalmologist were analyzed. The χ2 analysis was used to compare antifungal prescriptions and ocular exam findings before and after 2016. Trend analysis was also performed to assess temporal changes in prescribing practices and eye exam findings.

Results: There were 226 candidemia cases during the study period, 129 (57.1%) of which underwent screening eye exams. From 2014 to 2015, 24 of 37 (64.5%) patients received eye-penetrating antifungals compared to 36 of 92 (39.1%) from 2016 to 2020 (P = .008). Overall, 30 of 129 (23.3%) patients had abnormal eye exams with the prevalence of abnormal findings being 7 of 37 (18.9%) before 2016 compared to 23 of 92 (25%, P = .46) thereafter. A trend analysis revealed an increase in abnormal eye findings over the study period (P = .008). Of the 30 patients who had abnormal eye exams, 9 (30%) had a change in systemic antifungal therapy from echinocandins to eye-penetrating antifungals. Echinocandin use was associated with abnormal eye findings.

Conclusions: Prescription of eye-penetrating antifungals for candidemia has trended down since 2016. This was associated with a concomitant increase in abnormal findings on screening fundoscopy. Abnormal eye exams were not uncommon throughout our study period.

Keywords: candidemia guidelines; echinocandins; endopthalmitis; ocular candidiasis; routine eye-screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Prescribing patterns for antifungal before eye exam.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proportion of candidemic patients with eye findings.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, et al. . Clinical practice guideline for the management of Candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62:e1–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huynh N, Chang HYP, Borboli-Gerogiannis S.. Ocular involvement in hospitalized patients with candidemia: analysis at a Boston tertiary care center. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2012; 20:100–3. - PubMed
    1. Breazzano MP, Day HR, Bloch KC, et al. . Utility of ophthalmologic screening for patients with Candida bloodstream infections: a systematic review. JAMA Ophthalmol 2019; 137:698–710. - PubMed
    1. Vena A, Muñoz P, Padilla B, et al. . Is routine ophthalmoscopy really necessary in candidemic patients? PLoS One 2017; 12:e0183485. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vinikoor MJ, Zoghby J, Cohen KL, Tucker JD.. Do all candidemic patients need an ophthalmic examination? Int J Infect Dis 2013; 17:e146–8. - PubMed