Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 21;44(2):337-344.
doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbab091. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.

Similarities between the biochemical composition of jellyfish body and mucus

Affiliations

Similarities between the biochemical composition of jellyfish body and mucus

Nathan Hubot et al. J Plankton Res. .

Abstract

Recognition of the importance of jellyfish in marine ecosystems is growing. Yet, the biochemical composition of the mucus that jellyfish constantly excrete is poorly characterized. Here we analyzed the macromolecular (proteins, lipids and carbohydrates) and elemental (carbon and nitrogen) composition of the body and mucus of five scyphozoan jellyfish species (Aurelia aurita, Chrysaora fulgida, Chrysaora pacifica, Eupilema inexpectata and Rhizostoma pulmo). We found that the relative contribution of the different macromolecules and elements in the jellyfish body and mucus was similar across all species, with protein being the major component in all samples (81 ± 4% of macromolecules; 3.6 ± 3.1% of dry weight, DW) followed by lipids (13 ± 4% of macromolecules; 0.5 ± 0.4%DW) and carbohydrates (6 ± 3% of macromolecules; 0.3 ± 0.4%DW). The energy content of the jellyfish matter ranged from 0.2 to 3.1 KJ g-1 DW. Carbon and nitrogen content was 3.7 ± 3.0 and 1.0 ± 0.8%DW, respectively. The average ratios of protein:lipid:carbohydrate and carbon:nitrogen for all samples were 14.6:2.3:1 and 3.8:1, respectively. Our study highlights the biochemical similarity between the jellyfish body and mucus and provides convenient and valuable ratios to support the integration of jellyfish into trophic and biogeochemical models.

Keywords: carbohydrate; carbon; lipid; nitrogen; protein.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of the macromolecular content (protein, lipid, carbohydrate; A, B and C) and the sum of macromolecules to the ash-free dry weigh (AFDW, D) of mucus and body tissues in jellyfish species (A. aurita, C. fulgida, C. pacifica, E. inexplicata and R. pulmo) expressed as percentage of dry wet (%DW) of the samples. The lines represent the linear regressions and the shaded area is the confidence interval (see details in SI, Supplementary Table S2). The solid lines are the linear regressions on the whole data set with (A) lipid (LD) vs protein (PT; LD = 0.10 ± 0.01 PT + 0.10 ± 0.03), (B) carbohydrate (CH) vs lipid (CH = 0.78 ± 0.10 LP—0.05 ± 0.06), (C) carbohydrate vs protein, (CH = 0.10 ± 0.01 PT—0.04 ± 0.05) and (D) sum of macromolecules (SM) vs AFDW (SM = 1.12 ± 0.03 AFDW +11.24 ± 0.16).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of proteins, lipids and carbohydrates (A) and carbon and nitrogen (B) in the body and mucus of jellyfish species (A. aurita, C. fulgida, C. pacifica, E. inexplicata and R. pulmo) expressed as percentage of the dry weight (DW) of the sample and as relative proportion of the total proteins, lipids and carbohydrates (C) and carbon and nitrogen (D) content. The dots represent the C:N ratio (D).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Energy content of the body (dark gray) and mucus (light gray) of jellyfish species (A. aurita, C. fulgida, C. pacifica, E. inexplicata and R. pulmo) normalized to the dry weight (DW) of the samples (A). Error bars show the standard deviation. Linear regression between the energy content (EC) and the carbon content (CC) of jellyfish body (circles) and mucus (triangles; B). The lines represent the linear regressions and the shaded area is the confidence interval (see details in SI, Supplementary Table S2). The solid line is the linear regressions on the whole data set (EC = 35.03 ± 1.27 CC—0.05 ± 0.06, SI, Supplementary Table S2).

References

    1. Axelsson, M. and Gentili, F. (2014) A single-step method for rapid extraction of Total lipids from green microalgae. PLoS One, 9, e89643. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakshani, C. R., Morales-Garcia, A. L., Althaus, M., Wilcox, M. D., Pearson, J. P., Bythell, J. C. and Burgess, J. G. (2018) Evolutionary conservation of the antimicrobial function of mucus: a first defence against infection. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes, 4, 14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bansil, R. and Turner, B. S. (2018) The biology of mucus: composition, synthesis and organization. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 124, 3–15. - PubMed
    1. Bristow, L. A., Mohr, W., Ahmerkamp, S. and Kuypers, M. M. M. (2017) Nutrients that limit growth in the ocean. Curr. Biol., 27, R474–R478. - PubMed
    1. Briz, L. D., Sánchez, F., Marí, N. and Genzano, G. (2018) Seasonal variation of gelatinous plankton consumption by fish in the south-western Atlantic Ocean: a question of strategy. Mar. Biol. Res., 14, 739–751.