ARCS-M: forging progress from this negative trial in malignant pleural mesothelioma
- PMID: 35358447
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00099-7
ARCS-M: forging progress from this negative trial in malignant pleural mesothelioma
Conflict of interest statement
MGZ reports consulting fees from Ikena Oncology, the Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Aldeyra Therapeutics, and Novocure; honoraria for Continuing Medical Education content from Physicians’ Education Resource, Medscape, Research to Practice, Medical Learning Institute, and OncLive; research funding to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from PreCog, GlaxoSmithKline, Epizyme, Polaris, Sellas Life Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, the Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Curis, and Atara; and is chair of the board of directors of the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation (uncompensated). MO reports consulting fees Novartis and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; honoraria for CME content for OncLive, Targeted Oncology, and ASTRO; and is part of the scientific advisory board for the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation (uncompensated).
Comment on
-
Anetumab ravtansine versus vinorelbine in patients with relapsed, mesothelin-positive malignant pleural mesothelioma (ARCS-M): a randomised, open-label phase 2 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):540-552. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00061-4. Lancet Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35358455 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical