Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Aug;129(8):865-879.
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.03.024. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

Bevacizumab in High-Risk Corneal Transplantation: A Pilot Multicenter Prospective Randomized Control Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Bevacizumab in High-Risk Corneal Transplantation: A Pilot Multicenter Prospective Randomized Control Trial

Thomas H Dohlman et al. Ophthalmology. 2022 Aug.

Erratum in

  • Corrigendum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Ophthalmology. 2022 Nov;129(11):1334. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.08.006. Ophthalmology. 2022. PMID: 36272763 No abstract available.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of local (subconjunctival and topical) bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment in patients undergoing vascularized high-risk corneal transplantation.

Design: Pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted at 5 clinical centers in the United States, India, and Brazil.

Participants: Patients aged > 18 years undergoing high-risk penetrating keratoplasty, defined as corneal neovascularization (NV) in 1 or more quadrants ≥2 mm from the limbus or extension of corneal NV to the graft-host junction in a previously failed graft.

Methods: Patients were randomized to receive subconjunctival bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 ml) or placebo at the time of surgery, followed by topical bevacizumab (10 mg/ml) or topical placebo, administered 4 times per day for 4 weeks.

Main outcome measure: The 52-week endothelial immune rejection rate.

Results: Ninety-two patients were randomized to receive bevacizumab (n = 48) or control (n = 44). The 52-week endothelial rejection rate was 10% in the bevacizumab group and 19% in the control group (P = 0.20). Post hoc, extended follow-up at the lead study site showed an endothelial rejection rate of 3% in the bevacizumab group and 38% in the control group (P = 0.003). Treatment with bevacizumab was found to have a hazard ratio of 0.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.65, P = 0.01) in a post hoc Cox regression analysis.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing vascularized high-risk corneal transplantation, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of endothelial rejection at 1 year in the bevacizumab treatment group compared with the control group. This study may have been underpowered to detect a difference between treatment groups, and taken together, our data suggest that, in the current trial design, bevacizumab has a positive but not (yet) significant effect on endothelial rejection.

Keywords: Angiogenesis; Corneal transplantation; Neovascularization; Penetrating keratoplasty; Vascular endothelial growth factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design and patient flow. *Patients who were randomized but withdrew from the study before surgery or were lost to follow-up before surgery. These patients did not undergo surgery and did not receive study medication or control and were excluded from last observation carried forward analyses. Patients were lost to follow-up at week 8 (n = 1) and week 26 (n = 3). Patients were lost to follow-up at weeks 4 (n = 1), 26 (n = 1), and 39 (n = 1). §One patient developed infectious keratitis, was considered to have graft failure, and was withdrawn from the study to undergo keratoprosthesis surgery. LFU = lost to follow-up; QID = 4 times per day.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The 52-week endothelial rejection and graft failure. A, The 52-week endothelial rejection survival rate was 90% in the bevacizumab group versus 81% (P = 0.20) in the control group. B, The survival rate for overall graft failure was 85% in the bevacizumab treatment group and 74% in the control group (P = 0.16). Solid line: bevacizumab treatment group. Dashed line: control treatment group.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Endothelial rejection and graft failure in first versus repeat corneal transplants. A, In patients undergoing a first-time graft, the 52-week endothelial rejection survival rate was 86% in the bevacizumab group and 80% in the control group (P = 0.58). The survival rate for overall graft failure was also 86% in the bevacizumab group and 80% in the control group. B, In patients undergoing a repeat corneal transplant, the 52-week endothelial rejection survival rate was 92% in patients treated with bevacizumab compared with 81% in patients treated with control (P = 0.08). The 52-week overall graft failure survival rate was 84% in the bevacizumab group versus 70% in the placebo control group (P = 0.18). Solid line: bevacizumab treatment group. Dashed line: control treatment group.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Endothelial rejection and graft failure by extent of corneal neovascularization (NV). A, In patients with 3 or more clock-hours of corneal NV at baseline, endothelial rejection survival was 90% in patients receiving bevacizumab and 78% in patients receiving control (P = 0.12). Graft failure survival was 85% in patients receiving bevacizumab and 72% in patients receiving control (P = 0.14). B, In patients with 6 or more clock-hours of corneal NV at baseline, the endothelial rejection survival rate was 88% in the bevacizumab group versus 77% in the control group (P = 0.17), whereas the overall graft failure survival rate was 83% in the bevacizumab group versus 70% in the control group (P = 0.17). Solid line: bevacizumab treatment group. Dashed line: control treatment group. NV = neovascularization.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Endothelial rejection and graft failure by extent of corneal neovascularization (NV) in repeat corneal transplants. A, In patients with 3 or more clock-hours of corneal NV at baseline, endothelial rejection survival was 92% in patients receiving bevacizumab and 77% in patients receiving control (P = 0.13). Graft failure survival was 84% in patients receiving bevacizumab and 68% in patients receiving control (P = 0.17). B, In patients with 6 or more clock-hours of corneal NV at baseline, the endothelial rejection survival rate was 91% in the bevacizumab group versus 78% in the control group (P = 0.21), whereas the overall graft failure survival rate was 82% in the bevacizumab group versus 67% in the control group (P = 0.21). Solid line: bevacizumab treatment group. Dashed line: control treatment group.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Extended follow-up of endothelial rejection and graft failure at lead study site. A, Graft survival (endothelial rejection) was 97% in the bevacizumab group and 62% in the control group (P = 0.003). B, In terms of graft failure, survival was 34% in patients receiving bevacizumab and 39% in patients receiving control (P = 0.55). The median follow-up times in the bevacizumab and control groups were 207 and 176 weeks, respectively. Solid line: bevacizumab treatment group (n = 29). Dashed line: control treatment group (n = 30).
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Clinical characteristics after transplantation. A, Graft endothelial cell counts at weeks 26 and 52. B, Central corneal thickness at weeks 4 and 52. C, Change in the extent of corneal neovascularization (NV) from baseline to week 52 in clock-hours of involvement (**P = 0.006). D, Change in the length (in millimeters) of the longest corneal blood vessel from baseline to week 52. Black bars = bevacizumab. White bars = control.

References

    1. WHO. Blindness and Vision Impairment. World Health Organization; 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-im.... Accessed August 10, 2021.
    1. Eye Bank Association of American. 2019 Eye Banking Statistical Report. Washington, DC: Eye Bank Association of America; 2019.
    1. Alio JL, Montesel A, Sayyad F, et al. Corneal graft failure: an update. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105:1049–1058. - PubMed
    1. The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies (CCTS). Effectiveness of histocompatibility matching in high-risk corneal transplantation. The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:1392–1403. - PubMed
    1. Williams KA, Esterman AJ, Bartlett C, et al. How effective is penetrating corneal transplantation? Factors influencing long-term outcome in multivariate analysis. Transplantation. 2006;81:896–901. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances