Allosteric regulation of inducer and operator binding to the lactose repressor
- PMID: 3535880
- DOI: 10.1021/bi00367a020
Allosteric regulation of inducer and operator binding to the lactose repressor
Abstract
The effects of cysteine modification and variations in pH on the equilibrium parameters for inducer and operator binding to the lactose repressor protein were examined. Operator binding affinity was minimally affected by increasing the pH from 7.5 to 9.2, whereas inducer binding was decreased for both the unliganded protein and the repressor-operator complex over the same range. Inducer binding to the repressor became more cooperative at high pH. The midpoint for the change in inducer affinity and cooperativity was pH 8.3; this value correlates well with cysteine ionization. The differential between repressor-operator affinity in the presence and absence of inducer was significantly decreased by modification of the protein with methyl methanethiosulfonate (MMTS). In contrast to unreacted protein, the inducer binding parameters for MMTS-modified repressor were largely unaffected by pH variation. The free energy for formation of the completely liganded protein was calculated for two pathways; the delta G values for these two independent routes were equivalent only for stoichiometries of four inducers and two operators per repressor molecule. All of the binding data were analyzed quantitatively by using a Monod-Wyman-Changeux two-state model for allosteric regulation. The observed dependences of the isopropyl beta-D-thiogalactoside binding curves on pH, DNA concentration, and MMTS modification were fitted by varying only the equilibrium constant between the two conformational states of the protein. With this analysis, high pH favors the T (high operator/low inducer affinity) state, while modification of cysteine-281 with MMTS elicits a shift into the R (high inducer/low operator affinity) state.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Formation of mixed disulfide adducts at cysteine-281 of the lactose repressor protein affects operator and inducer binding parameters.Biochemistry. 1986 Sep 23;25(19):5468-74. doi: 10.1021/bi00367a018. Biochemistry. 1986. PMID: 3535878
-
Characterization and modification of a monomeric mutant of the lactose repressor protein.Biochemistry. 1986 Sep 23;25(19):5474-8. doi: 10.1021/bi00367a019. Biochemistry. 1986. PMID: 3535879
-
Equilibrium binding of inducer to lac repressor.operator DNA complex.J Biol Chem. 1980 Nov 10;255(21):10107-14. J Biol Chem. 1980. PMID: 7000771
-
Wild-type operator binding and altered cooperativity for inducer binding of lac repressor dimer mutant R3.J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 29;269(17):12482-7. J Biol Chem. 1994. PMID: 8175655
-
Cooperativity of allosteric receptors.J Mol Biol. 2013 May 13;425(9):1424-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.03.011. Epub 2013 Mar 21. J Mol Biol. 2013. PMID: 23523898 Review.
Cited by
-
Genetic switching by the Lac repressor is based on two-state Monod-Wyman-Changeux allostery.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Dec 5;120(49):e2311240120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2311240120. Epub 2023 Nov 29. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023. PMID: 38019859 Free PMC article.
-
Combinatorial transcriptional control of the lactose operon of Escherichia coli.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 3;104(14):6043-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606717104. Epub 2007 Mar 21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007. PMID: 17376875 Free PMC article.
-
Interaction of Gal repressor with inducer and operator: induction of gal transcription from repressor-bound DNA.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Apr 1;94(7):2957-62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.7.2957. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997. PMID: 9096328 Free PMC article.
-
Ligand-induced conformational changes and conformational dynamics in the solution structure of the lactose repressor protein.J Mol Biol. 2008 Feb 15;376(2):466-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.11.067. Epub 2007 Nov 28. J Mol Biol. 2008. PMID: 18164724 Free PMC article.
-
Structure-guided approach to site-specific fluorophore labeling of the lac repressor LacI.PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0198416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198416. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29856839 Free PMC article.