Impact of machine-learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve on decision-making in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- PMID: 35359166
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08758-8
Impact of machine-learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve on decision-making in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate feasibility and diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) for detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and decision-making in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to potentially avoid additional pre-TAVR invasive coronary angiography (ICA).
Methods: Consecutive patients with severe AS (n = 95, 78.6 ± 8.8 years, 53% female) undergoing pre-procedural TAVR-CT followed by ICA with quantitative coronary angiography were retrospectively analyzed. CCTA datasets were evaluated using CAD Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification. CT-FFR measurements were computed using an on-site machine-learning algorithm. A combined algorithm was developed for decision-making to determine if ICA is needed based on pre-TAVR CCTA: [1] all patients with CAD-RADS ≥ 4 are referred for ICA; [2] patients with CAD-RADS 2 and 3 are evaluated utilizing CT-FFR and sent to ICA if CT-FFR ≤ 0.80; [3] patients with CAD-RADS < 2 or CAD-RADS 2-3 and normal CT-FFR are not referred for ICA.
Results: Twelve patients (13%) had significant CAD (≥ 70% stenosis) on ICA and were treated with PCI. Twenty-eight patients (30%) showed CT-FFR ≤ 0.80 and 24 (86%) of those were reported to have a maximum stenosis ≥ 50% during ICA. Using the proposed algorithm, significant CAD could be identified with a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of 100%, 78%, 40%, and 100%, respectively, potentially decreasing the number of necessary ICAs by 65 (68%).
Conclusion: Combination of CT-FFR and CAD-RADS is able to identify significant CAD pre-TAVR and bears potential to significantly reduce the number of needed ICAs.
Key points: • Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) using machine learning together with the CAD Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification safely identifies significant coronary artery disease based on quantitative coronary angiography in patients prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement. • The combination of CT-FFR and CAD-RADS enables decision-making and bears the potential to significantly reduce the number of needed invasive coronary angiographies.
Keywords: Angiography; Coronary artery disease; Fractional flow reserve; Multidetector computed tomography; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic Performance of CCTA and CT-FFR for the Detection of CAD in TAVR Work-Up.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun 13;15(11):1140-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.03.025. Epub 2022 May 11. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022. PMID: 35680194
-
Combined cCTA and TAVR Planning for Ruling Out Significant CAD: Added Value of ML-Based CT-FFR.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):476-486. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Nov 17. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022. PMID: 34801449
-
Two birds with one stone: pre-TAVI coronary CT angiography combined with FFR helps screen for coronary stenosis.BMC Med Imaging. 2025 May 26;25(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01704-2. BMC Med Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40420013 Free PMC article.
-
Coronary CTA and CT-FFR in trans-catheter aortic valve implantation candidates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar;35(3):1552-1569. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11211-7. Epub 2024 Dec 31. Eur Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39738560
-
Is it the Time to Move Towards Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? The Pros and Cons.Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023;19(4):e190123212887. doi: 10.2174/1573403X19666230119115228. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023. PMID: 36658709 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Interrater variability of ML-based CT-FFR during TAVR-planning: influence of image quality and coronary artery calcifications.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Dec 21;10:1301619. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1301619. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 38188259 Free PMC article.
-
An Overview of Computational Coronary Physiology Technologies Based on Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jun 13;25(6):211. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2506211. eCollection 2024 Jun. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39076307 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Innovation in Interventional Cardiovascular Care.J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Mar 18;4(3Part B):102562. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.102562. eCollection 2025 Mar. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025. PMID: 40230673 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement on changes of coronary computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve.Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2420860. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2420860. Epub 2024 Oct 28. Ann Med. 2024. PMID: 39466648 Free PMC article.
-
Current Concepts and Future Applications of Non-Invasive Functional and Anatomical Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease.Life (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;12(11):1803. doi: 10.3390/life12111803. Life (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36362957 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ et al (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364(23):2187–2198
-
- Moat NE, Ludman P, de Belder MA et al (2011) Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: the U.K. TAVI (United Kingdom Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(20):2130–2138
-
- Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Gentile F et al (2021) 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 143(5):e35–e71 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous