Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 1;5(1):10.
doi: 10.1186/s42492-022-00106-3.

Acquisition repeatability of MRI radiomics features in the head and neck: a dual-3D-sequence multi-scan study

Affiliations

Acquisition repeatability of MRI radiomics features in the head and neck: a dual-3D-sequence multi-scan study

Cindy Xue et al. Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art. .

Abstract

Radiomics has increasingly been investigated as a potential biomarker in quantitative imaging to facilitate personalized diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC), a group of malignancies associated with high heterogeneity. However, the feature reliability of radiomics is a major obstacle to its broad validity and generality in application to the highly heterogeneous head and neck (HN) tissues. In particular, feature repeatability of radiomics in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition, which is considered a crucial confounding factor of radiomics feature reliability, is still sparsely investigated. This study prospectively investigated the acquisition repeatability of 93 MRI radiomics features in ten HN tissues of 15 healthy volunteers, aiming for potential magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) treatment of HNC. Each subject underwent four MRI acquisitions with MRgRT treatment position and immobilization using two pulse sequences of 3D T1-weighed turbo spin-echo and 3D T2-weighed turbo spin-echo on a 1.5 T MRI simulator. The repeatability of radiomics feature acquisition was evaluated in terms of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), whereas within-subject acquisition variability was evaluated in terms of the coefficient of variation (CV). The results showed that MRI radiomics features exhibited heterogeneous acquisition variability and uncertainty dependent on feature types, tissues, and pulse sequences. Only a small fraction of features showed excellent acquisition repeatability (ICC > 0.9) and low within-subject variability. Multiple MRI scans improved the accuracy and confidence of the identification of reliable features concerning MRI acquisition compared to simple test-retest repeated scans. This study contributes to the literature on the reliability of radiomics features with respect to MRI acquisition and the selection of reliable radiomics features for use in modeling in future HNC MRgRT applications.

Keywords: Head and neck; Intraclass correlation coefficient; Magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy; Radiomics; Repeatability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Subject positional verification setup and the acquired 3D TSE MR images. (a) A subject immobilized using thermoplastic mask aligned with the external laser system; (b) a subject setup and the coil setting on the MR-sim; (c) all ten VOIs on MRI image
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Boxplots of ICC values in different tissue VOIs for both pulse sequences
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Boxplots of ICC values for different radiomics feature categories in all VOIs for both pulse sequences
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Percentages of excellent, good, moderate, and poor ICCs of radiomics features in different tissue VOIs for (a) 3D-T1W-TSE and (b) 3D-T2W-TSE pulse sequences
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Acquisition repeatability of radiomics features for each VOI and pulse sequence. Excellent (ICC > 0.9), good (0.9 > ICC > 0.75), moderate (0.75 > ICC > 0.5), and poor (ICC < 0.5) repeatability was marked by green, yellow, red, and black blocks respectively
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The heatmaps depicting CVintra-subject values of all radiomics features in different VOIs for 3D-T1W-TSE and 3D-T2W-TSE pulse sequences
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Boxplots of the feature CVintra-subject values in different tissue VOIs for both pulse sequences

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chow LQM. Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(1):60–72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1715715. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simard EP, Torre LA, Jemal A. International trends in head and neck cancer incidence rates: differences by country, sex and anatomic site. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(5):387–403. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.01.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gatta G, Botta L, Sánchez MJ, Anderson LA, Pierannunzio D, Licitra L. Prognoses and improvement for head and neck cancers diagnosed in Europe in early 2000s: the EUROCARE-5 population-based study. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(15):2130–2143. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dai YL, King AD. State of the art MR I in head and neck cancer. Clin Radiol. 2018;73(1):45–59. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.05.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Law BKH, King AD, Ai QY, Poon DMC, Chen WT, Bhatia KS, et al. Head and neck tumors: amide proton transfer MRI. Radiology. 2018;288(3):782–790. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018171528. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources