Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 14:13:800757.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.800757. eCollection 2022.

Serial Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training Improves Bidirectional Walking Performance in Chronic Stroke

Affiliations

Serial Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training Improves Bidirectional Walking Performance in Chronic Stroke

Oluwole O Awosika et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Background and research question: Walking impairment remains a major limitation to functional independence after stroke. Yet, comprehensive and effective strategies to improve walking function after stroke are presently limited. Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training (BLTT) is a promising training approach for improving walking function; however, little is known about its mechanism of effect or the relationship between backward walking training and resulting overground forward walking performance. This study aims to determine the effects of serial BLTT on spatial aspects of backward and forward walking in chronic post-stroke individuals with residual walking impairment.

Methods: Thirty-nine adults (>6 months post-stroke) underwent 6 days of BLTT (3 × /week) over 2 weeks. Outcome measures included PRE-POST changes in backward and forward walking speeds, paretic and non-paretic step lengths, and single-support center of pressure distances. To determine the association between BLTT and overground walking, correlation analyses comparing training-related changes in these variables were performed.

Results: We report an overall improvement in BLTT and overground walking speeds, bilateral step lengths, and single-support center of pressure distances over six training sessions. Further, there were weak positive associations between PRE-POST changes in BLTT speed, BLTT paretic step length, and overground forward walking speed.

Conclusion and significance: Our findings suggest that individuals with chronic post-stroke walking impairment experience improvements in spatial walking measures during BLTT and overground. Therefore, BLTT may be a potential adjunctive training approach for post-stroke walking rehabilitation.

Keywords: backward locomotion; backward treadmill training; gait rehabilitation; post stroke walking rehabilitation; walking impairment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Backward locomotor treadmill training (BLTT) protocol. Study participants underwent six, 30-min sessions of BLTT over a 2-week period (red cubes). Outcome measures were obtained prior to training at baseline (D2), subsequent training days (D3–D7), and ~24 h following the completion of training (D8).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Backward locomotor training (BLTT) speed and step length over six training sessions. Mean progression in BLTT speed (A) paretic and non-paretic step lengths (B) per training session from baseline (D2) through session 6 (D7), (error bars show standard error, ****indicates significance level <0.001).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ten meter walk test (10-mWT). Mean change in 10-mWT speed relative to baseline [dotted line signifies the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)- ≥0.15 meters/s] (A). Mean training-related change in paretic and non-paretic step lengths (B), and percent single support times (C) (error bars are standard error, ****indicates significance level <0.001, ***level <0.01).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Correlation analysis of backward locomotor treadmill training change in BLTT speed (A) and paretic Step Length (B) and overground walking speed on the 10-meter walk test.

References

    1. Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. (2005) 352:1677–84. 10.1056/NEJMcp043511 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verma R, Arya K, Sharma P, Garg RK. Understanding gait control in post-stroke: implications for management. J Bodywork Mov Ther. (2012) 16:14–21. 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.12.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eng JJ, Tang P-F. Gait training strategies to optimize walking ability in people with stroke: a synthesis of the evidence. Exp Rev Neurother. (2007) 7:1417–36. 10.1586/14737175.7.10.1417 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weerdesteijn VG, Niet MD, Van Duijnhoven HJ, Geurts AC. Falls in individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. (2008) 45:1195–213. 10.1682/JRRD.2007.09.0145 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nadeau SE, Wu SS, Dobkin BH, Azen SP, Rose DK, Tilson JK, et al. . Effects of task-specific and impairment-based training compared with usual care on functional walking ability after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2013) 27:370–80. 10.1177/1545968313481284 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources