Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2022 Mar 24;10(1):e12157.
doi: 10.1002/anr3.12157. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.

Dual epidural catheter technique to provide opioid-free anaesthesia for an open abdominoperineal resection

Affiliations
Case Reports

Dual epidural catheter technique to provide opioid-free anaesthesia for an open abdominoperineal resection

J J le Roux et al. Anaesth Rep. .

Abstract

The peri-operative analgesic management of patients undergoing major elective colorectal surgery has an impact on patient recovery. An approach that favours an opioid-free strategy has demonstrated improved patient outcomes. Avoiding systemic opioids during and after abdominal surgery promotes early recovery of bowel function and early re-initiation of oral intake, shortens hospital length of stay, minimises postoperative complications, and may improve long-term outcomes. In this case report we describe an opioid-free anaesthetic technique, in line with current Enhanced Recovery After Surgery recommendations, for a patient undergoing an open abdominoperineal resection who reported experiencing severe side-effects to opioids in the past. Two epidural catheters were sited pre-operatively at the interspaces between the ninth and tenth thoracic and third and fourth lumbar vertebrae respectively, and used intra- and postoperatively. The utilisation of two epidural catheters not only ensured complete peri-operative analgesia, but also successfully attenuated the neuroendocrine stress response to surgery. The dual epidural catheter technique may be considered for extensive colorectal surgery when conventional opioid-based anaesthetic techniques are contraindicated.

Keywords: epidural analgesia: complications; epidural local anaesthetic: GI effect; stress response: metabolic effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient in sitting position with dual epidural catheters sited preoperatively (T9/T10 and L3/L4 respectively).

Similar articles

References

    1. Gustafsson U, Scott M, Hubner M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations: 2018. World Journal of Surgery 2019; 43: 659–95. - PubMed
    1. Carli F, Kehlet H, Baldini G, et al. Evidence basis for regional anesthesia in multidisciplinary fast‐track surgical care pathways. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2011; 36: 63–72. - PubMed
    1. Brown MJ, Kor DJ, Allen MS, et al. Dual‐epidural catheter technique and perioperative outcomes after Ivor‐Lewis esophagectomy. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2019; 38: 3–8. - PubMed
    1. Ekatodramis G, Min K, Cathrein P, et al. Use of a double epidural catheter provides effective postoperative analgesia after spine deformity surgery. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2002; 49: 173–7. - PubMed
    1. Patel S, Lutz JM, Panchagnula U, et al. Anesthesia and perioperative management of colorectal surgical patients–a clinical review (part 1). Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology 2012; 28: 162. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types