Bayesian approximations to the theory of visual attention (TVA) in a foraging task
- PMID: 35361003
- DOI: 10.1177/17470218221094572
Bayesian approximations to the theory of visual attention (TVA) in a foraging task
Abstract
Foraging as a natural visual search for multiple targets has increasingly been studied in humans in recent years. Here, we aimed to model the differences in foraging strategies between feature and conjunction foraging tasks found by Á. Kristjánsson et al. Bundesen proposed the theory of visual attention (TVA) as a computational model of attentional function that divides the selection process into filtering and pigeonholing. The theory describes a mechanism by which the strength of sensory evidence serves to categorise elements. We combined these ideas to train augmented Naïve Bayesian classifiers using data from Á. Kristjánsson et al. as input. Specifically, we attempted to answer whether it is possible to predict how frequently observers switch between different target types during consecutive selections (switches) during feature and conjunction foraging using Bayesian classifiers. We formulated 11 new parameters that represent key sensory and bias information that could be used for each selection during the foraging task and tested them with multiple Bayesian models. Separate Bayesian networks were trained on feature and conjunction foraging data, and parameters that had no impact on the model's predictability were pruned away. We report high accuracy for switch prediction in both tasks from the classifiers, although the model for conjunction foraging was more accurate. We also report our Bayesian parameters in terms of their theoretical associations with TVA parameters, (denoting the pertinence value), and (denoting the decision-making bias).
Keywords: Bayesian classifier; TVA; Visual attention; attentional switching; foraging.
Similar articles
-
Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks.Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104032. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104032. Epub 2019 Aug 30. Cognition. 2020. PMID: 31476612
-
Moving foraging into three dimensions: Feature- versus conjunction-based foraging in virtual reality.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Feb;75(2):313-327. doi: 10.1177/1747021820937020. Epub 2020 Jul 11. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022. PMID: 32519926
-
The time course of visual foraging in the lifespan: Spatial scanning, organization search, and target processing.Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):325-339. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02345-8. Epub 2023 Aug 24. Psychon Bull Rev. 2024. PMID: 37620634 Free PMC article.
-
Components of visual bias: a multiplicative hypothesis.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339:116-24. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12665. Epub 2015 Feb 12. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015. PMID: 25675882 Review.
-
Foraging behavior in visual search: A review of theoretical and mathematical models in humans and animals.Psychol Res. 2022 Mar;86(2):331-349. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01499-1. Epub 2021 Mar 21. Psychol Res. 2022. PMID: 33745028 Review.
Cited by
-
Foraging as sampling without replacement: A Bayesian statistical model for estimating biases in target selection.PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jan 24;18(1):e1009813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009813. eCollection 2022 Jan. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022. PMID: 35073315 Free PMC article.
-
One factor to bind them all: visual foraging organization to predict patch leaving behavior with ROC curves.Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Apr 5;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00624-7. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025. PMID: 40188319 Free PMC article.
-
Risky hybrid foraging: The impact of risk, reward value, and prevalence on foraging behavior in hybrid visual search.J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Nov 14:10.1037/xge0001652. doi: 10.1037/xge0001652. Online ahead of print. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024. PMID: 39541518
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources