Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 31;12(1):5441.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09108-w.

Methane emissions and rumen metabolite concentrations in cattle fed two different silages

Affiliations

Methane emissions and rumen metabolite concentrations in cattle fed two different silages

R Bica et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

In this study, 18 animals were fed two forage-based diets: red clover (RC) and grass silage (GS), in a crossover-design experiment in which methane (CH4) emissions were recorded in respiration chambers. Rumen samples obtained through naso-gastric sampling tubes were analysed by NMR. Methane yield (g/kg DM) was significantly lower from animals fed RC (17.8 ± 3.17) compared to GS (21.2 ± 4.61) p = 0.008. In total 42 metabolites were identified, 6 showing significant differences between diets (acetate, propionate, butyrate, valerate, 3-phenylopropionate, and 2-hydroxyvalerate). Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to assess which metabolites were more important to distinguish between diets and partial least squares (PLS) regressions were used to assess which metabolites were more strongly associated with the variation in CH4 emissions. Acetate, butyrate and propionate along with dimethylamine were important for the distinction between diets according to the PLS-DA results. PLS regression revealed that diet and dry matter intake are key factors to explain CH4 variation when included in the model. Additionally, PLS was conducted within diet, revealing that the association between metabolites and CH4 emissions can be conditioned by diet. These results provide new insights into the methylotrophic methanogenic pathway, confirming that metabolite profiles change according to diet composition, with consequences for CH4 emissions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Boxplot of CH4 yield (CH4 g/kg DM) in grass silage and red clover silage fed animals.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) score plots of 35 rumen samples from the animals fed grass silage and red clover silage.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Venn diagram of number of metabolites which were relevant according to the VIP criterion in PLS modelling between Model 3 and Model 4 for red clover silage (RC) and grass silage (GS). The common metabolites were acetamide, succinate, glucose, methanol, ethanol and formate.

References

    1. Saunois M, et al. The global methane budget 2000–2012. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 2016;8(2):697–751. doi: 10.5194/essd-8-697-2016. - DOI
    1. Johnson KA, Johnson DE. Methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1995;73(8):2483–2492. doi: 10.2527/1995.7382483x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray RM, et al. Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 1976;36(1):1–14. doi: 10.1079/bjn19760053. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morgavi DP, et al. Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Animal. 2010;4(7):1024–1036. doi: 10.1017/S1751731110000546. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rooke JA, et al. Hydrogen and methane emissions from beef cattle and their rumen microbial community vary with diet, time after feeding and genotype. Br. J. Nutr. 2014;112(3):398–407. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514000932. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types