Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;6(5):635-645.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01321-x. Epub 2022 Mar 31.

Global phylogenetic analysis reveals multiple origins and correlates of genital mutilation/cutting

Affiliations

Global phylogenetic analysis reveals multiple origins and correlates of genital mutilation/cutting

Gabriel Šaffa et al. Nat Hum Behav. 2022 May.

Abstract

Genital mutilation/cutting is costly in terms of health, survival and reproduction, and the long-term maintenance of these practices is an evolutionary conundrum. Previous studies have suggested a mate-guarding function or various signalling functions of genital mutilation/cutting. Here we use phylogenetic comparative methods and two global ethnographic samples to study the origins and socio-ecological correlates of major types of female and male genital mutilation/cutting. Male genital mutilation/cutting probably originated in polygynous societies with separate residence of co-wives, supporting a mate-guarding function. Female genital mutilation/cutting originated subsequently and almost exclusively in societies already practising male genital mutilation/cutting, where it may have become a signal of chastity. Both have originated multiple times, some as early as in the mid-Holocene (5,000-7,000 years ago), considerably predating the earliest archaeological evidence and written records. Genital mutilation/cutting co-evolves with and may help maintain fundamental social structures, hindering efforts to change these cultural practices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO Guidelines on the Management of Health Complications from Female Genital Mutilation (WHO, 2016).
    1. Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (Maputo Protocol Text) (African Union, 2003); https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/violenceagainstwomen/publications/protoc...
    1. Muthumbi, J., Svanemyr, J., Scolaro, E., Temmerman, M. & Say, L. Female genital mutilation: a literature review of the current status of legislation and policies in 27 African countries and Yemen. Afr. J. Reprod. Health 19, 32–40 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Efferson, C., Vogt, S. & Fehr, E. The promise and the peril of using social influence to reverse harmful traditions. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 55–68 (2020). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Bell, K. Genital cutting and Western discourses on sexuality. Med. Anthropol. Q. 19, 125–148 (2005). - PubMed - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources