Agreement of the Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale (N-PASS) With NICU Nurses' Assessments
- PMID: 35362716
 - DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000968
 
Agreement of the Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale (N-PASS) With NICU Nurses' Assessments
Abstract
Background: Objective assessment tools should standardize and reflect nurses' expert assessments. The Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale (N-PASS) and the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) are valid measures of pain. The N-PASS also provides a sedation subscale.
Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine N-PASS clinical validity and utility by evaluating agreement of N-PASS scores with bedside nurses' assessments of pain/agitation and sedation in a 64-bed tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.
Methods: Fifteen bedside nurses trained to use the N-PASS and the NIPS prospectively completed 202 pain/agitation and sedation assessments from a convenience sample of 88 infants, including chronically ventilated, medically fragile infants. N-PASS and NIPS scores were obtained simultaneously but independently of nurse investigators. Bedside nurses also made recommendations about infants' pain and sedation management.
Results: There was moderate agreement between N-PASS pain scores and nurses' recommendations (κ= 0.52), very strong agreement between N-PASS sedation scores and nurses' recommendations (κ= 0.99), and very strong associations between N-PASS pain and NIPS scores ( P < .001). Bedside nurse and independent investigator interrater reliability was good for N-PASS pain and NIPS scores (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.83, ICC = 0.85) and excellent for N-PASS sedation (ICC = 0.94). During 93% of assessments, bedside nurses reported that the N-PASS reflected the level of infant sedation well or very well.
Implications for practice and research: The N-PASS provides an easy-to-use, valid, and reliable objective measure of pain and sedation that reflects nurses' assessments. Additional studies using the N-PASS are needed to verify results and the influence of the N-PASS on pain and sedation management for medically fragile infants with chronic medical conditions.
Copyright © 2022 by The National Association of Neonatal Nurses.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 
    
- Herr K, Coyne PJ, Ely E, Gélinas C, Manworren RCB. Pain assessment in the patient unable to self-report: clinical practice recommendations in support of the ASPMN 2019 Position Statement. Pain Manag Nurs. 2019;20(5):404–417. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2019.07.005.
 
 - 
    
- Andersen RD, Langius-Eklöf A, Nakstad B, Bernklev T, Jylli L. The measurement properties of pediatric observational pain scales: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;73:93–101. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.05.010.
 
 - 
    
- Anand KJ. Pharmacological approaches to the management of pain in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol. 2007;27(suppl 1):S4–S11. doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7211712.
 
 - 
    
- Giordano V, Edobor J, Deindl P, et al. Pain and sedation scales for neonatal and pediatric patients in a preverbal stage of development: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(12):1186–1197. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3351.
 
 - 
    
- Hummel P, van Dijk M. Pain assessment: current status and challenges. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;11(4):237–245. doi:10.1016/j.siny.2006.02.004.
 
 
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
