Response-The Multiple Understandings in the Clinic Do Not Always Need to be Resolved
- PMID: 35362918
- DOI: 10.1007/s11673-021-10143-x
Response-The Multiple Understandings in the Clinic Do Not Always Need to be Resolved
Abstract
This article reflects on the assumption underlying the argument of Little et al. that "contested understandings" in the clinic are susceptible to reconciliation within a liberal framework described as "pragmatic pluralism". It is argued that no such reconciliation is possible or desirable because it is of the nature of the clinic that it provides a forum for multiple voices, ethical and cultural perspectives, and conceptual frameworks, and this is the source of its fecundity and creativity. Medicine itself cannot be represented by a single discourse, precisely because it is itself an unruly collection of practices that, despite their heterogeneity, are able to engage in productive dialogues with each other. The heteroglossia of the clinic, therefore, is not a problem to be overcome. Rather, it is a rich resource to be mobilized in accordance with its multiple inherent purposes.
Keywords: Bahktin; Deleuze; Ethics; Heteroglossia; Philosophy of medicine; Postmodernism; Reconciliation.
© 2022. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd.
Comment on
-
Pragmatic pluralism: Mutual tolerance of contested understandings between orthodox and alternative practitioners in autologous stem cell transplantation.J Bioeth Inq. 2022 Mar;19(1):85-96. doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10177-9. J Bioeth Inq. 2022. PMID: 35362926
References
-
- Bakhtin, M.M. Michael Holquist (ed.). 1981. Discourse in the novel. In The dialogic imagination: Four essays, 259-422. Austin: University of Texas Press.
-
- Bauman, Z. 1995. The stranger revisited—and revisiting. In Life in fragments: Essays in postmodern morality, 126-138. Oxford: Blackwell.
-
- Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
-
- Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
-
- Horkheimer, M., and T.W. Adorno. 2002. Dialectic of enlightenment. Stanford University Press.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources