Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Jun 1;28(11):2237-2247.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2326.

Phase Ib/II Study of Enzalutamide with Samotolisib (LY3023414) or Placebo in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase Ib/II Study of Enzalutamide with Samotolisib (LY3023414) or Placebo in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Christopher J Sweeney et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: To report efficacy and safety of samotolisib (LY3023414; PI3K/mTOR dual kinase and DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor) plus enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following cancer progression on abiraterone.

Patients and methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled phase Ib/II study (NCT02407054), following a lead-in segment for evaluating safety and pharmacokinetics of samotolisib and enzalutamide combination, patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer with progression on prior abiraterone were randomized to receive enzalutamide (160 mg daily)/samotolisib (200 mg twice daily) or placebo. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group criteria (PCWG2). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included radiographic PFS (rPFS) and biomarkers, respectively. Log-rank tests assessed treatment group differences.

Results: Overall, 13 and 129 patients were enrolled in phase Ib and II, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicity was not reported in patients during phase Ib and mean samotolisib exposures remained in the targeted range despite a 35% decrease when administered with enzalutamide. In phase II, median PCWG2-PFS and rPFS was significantly longer in the samotolisib/enzalutamide versus placebo/enzalutamide arm (3.8 vs. 2.8 months; P = 0.003 and 10.2 vs. 5.5 months; P = 0.03), respectively. Patients without androgen receptor splice variant 7 showed a significant and clinically meaningful rPFS benefit in the samotolisib/enzalutamide versus placebo/enzalutamide arm (13.2 months vs. 5.3 months; P = 0.03).

Conclusions: Samotolisib/enzalutamide has tolerable side effects and significantly improved PFS in patients with mCRPC with cancer progression on abiraterone, and this may be enriched in patients with PTEN intact and no androgen receptor splice variant 7.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1. Study design: Figure describes the study design followed in the phase Ib and phase II part of the trial.
Figure 1.
Study design: Figure describes the study design followed in the phase Ib and phase II part of the trial. BID, twice a day; ENZ, enzalutamide; mCRPC, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; n, number of patients; QD, every day; RR, response rate.
Figure 2. PFS and rPFS of patients from phase II. A, The PFS of samotolisib + enzalutamide arm versus placebo + enzalutamide arm. B, The rPFS of samotolisib + enzalutamide arm versus placebo + enzalutamide arm.
Figure 2.
PFS and rPFS of patients from phase II. A, The PFS of samotolisib + enzalutamide arm versus placebo + enzalutamide arm. B, The rPFS of samotolisib + enzalutamide arm versus placebo + enzalutamide arm.
Figure 3. Waterfall plot of best prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response.
Figure 3.
Waterfall plot of best prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response.
Figure 4. rPFS by AR-v7 status. A, The PFS of samotolisib + enzalutamide arm versus placebo + enzalutamide arm in patients without AR v-7. B, The PFS of samotolisib + enzalutamide arm versus placebo + enzalutamide arm in patients with AR v-7.
Figure 4.
rPFS by AR-v7 status. A, The PFS of samotolisib + enzalutamide arm versus placebo + enzalutamide arm in patients without AR-v7. B, The PFS of samotolisib + enzalutamide arm versus placebo + enzalutamide arm in patients with AR-v7.
Figure 5. rPFS by PTEN (IHC) assay. A, The PFS of samotolisib + enzalutamide arm versus placebo + enzalutamide arm in patients with PTEN loss. B, The PFS of samotolisib + enzalutamide arm versus placebo + enzalutamide arm in patients without PTEN loss.
Figure 5.
rPFS by PTEN (IHC) assay. A, The PFS of samotolisib + enzalutamide arm versus placebo + enzalutamide arm in patients with PTEN loss. B, The PFS of samotolisib + enzalutamide arm versus placebo + enzalutamide arm in patients without PTEN loss.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–49. - PubMed
    1. Kelly SP, Anderson WF, Rosenberg PS, Cook MB. Past, current, and future incidence rates and burden of metastatic prostate cancer in the United States. Eur Urol Focus 2018;4:121–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Omlin A, Pezaro C, Mukherji D, Mulick Cassidy A, Sandhu S, Bianchini D, et al. Improved survival in a cohort of trial participants with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer demonstrates the need for updated prognostic nomograms. Eur Urol 2013;64:300–6. - PubMed
    1. Patrikidou A, Loriot Y, Eymard JC, Albiges L, Massard C, Ileana E, et al. Who dies from prostate cancer? Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2014;17:348–52. - PubMed
    1. Ritch C, Cookson M. Recent trends in the management of advanced prostate cancer. F1000Res 2018;7:F1000. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data