Immunogenicity and safety of booster CYD-TDV dengue vaccine after alternative primary vaccination schedules in healthy individuals aged 9-50 years: a randomised, controlled, phase 2, non-inferiority study
- PMID: 35364022
- DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00706-4
Immunogenicity and safety of booster CYD-TDV dengue vaccine after alternative primary vaccination schedules in healthy individuals aged 9-50 years: a randomised, controlled, phase 2, non-inferiority study
Abstract
Background: Dengue is endemic in many countries throughout the tropics and subtropics, and the disease causes substantial morbidity and health-care burdens in these regions. We previously compared antibody responses after one-dose, two-dose, or three-dose primary regimens with the only approved dengue vaccine CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia; Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France) in individuals aged 9 years and older with previous dengue exposure. In this study, we assessed the need for a CYD-TDV booster after these primary vaccination regimens.
Methods: In this randomised, controlled, phase 2, non-inferiority study, healthy individuals aged 9-50 years recruited from three sites in Colombia and three sites in the Philippines (excluding those with the usual contraindications to vaccinations) were randomly assigned 1:1:1 via a permuted block method with stratification by site and by age group using an independent voice response system to receive, at 6-month intervals, three doses of CYD-TDV (three-dose group), one dose of placebo followed by two doses of CYD-TDV (two-dose group), or two doses of placebo followed by one dose of CYD-TDV (one-dose group). Participants were also randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a CYD-TDV booster at 1 year or 2 years after the last primary dose. Each CYD-TDV dose was 0·5 mL and administered subcutaneously in the deltoid region of the upper arm. The investigators and sponsor, study staff interacting with the investigators, and participants and their parents or legally acceptable representatives were masked to group assignment. Neutralising antibodies were measured by 50% plaque reduction neutralisation testing, and geometric mean titres (GMTs) were calculated. Due to a change in study protocol, only participants who were dengue seropositive at baseline in the Colombian cohort received a booster vaccination. The primary outcome was to show non-inferiority of the booster dose administered at 1 year or 2 years after the two-dose and three-dose primary regimens; non-inferiority was shown if the lower limit of the two-sided adjusted 95% CI of the between-group (day 28 post-booster dose GMT from the three-dose or two-dose group vs day 28 GMT post-dose three of the three-dose primary regimen [three-dose group]) geometric mean ratio (GMR) was higher than 0·5 for each serotype. Non-inferiority of the 1-year or 2-year booster was shown if all four serotypes achieved non-inferiority. Safety was assessed among all participants who received the booster. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02628444, and is closed to accrual.
Findings: Between May 2 and Sept 16, 2016, we recruited and enrolled 1050 individuals who received either vaccine or placebo. Of the 350, 348, and 352 individuals randomly assigned to three-dose, two-dose, and one-dose groups, respectively, 108, 115, and 115 from the Colombian cohort were dengue seropositive at baseline and received a booster; 55 and 53 in the three-dose group received a booster after 1 year and 2 years, respectively, as did 59 and 56 in the two-dose group, and 62 and 53 in the one-dose group. After the three-dose primary schedule, non-inferiority was shown for serotypes 2 (GMR 0·746; 95% CI 0·550-1·010) and 3 (1·040; 0·686-1·570) but not serotypes 1 (0·567; 0·399-0·805) and 4 (0·647; 0·434-0·963) for the 1-year booster, and again for serotypes 2 (0·871; 0·673-1·130) and 3 (1·150; 0·887-1·490) but not serotypes 1 (0·688; 0·479-0·989) and 4 (0·655; 0·471-0·911) for the 2-year booster. Similarly, after the two-dose primary schedule, non-inferiority was shown for serotypes 2 (0·809; 0·505-1·300) and 3 (1·19; 0·732-1·940) but not serotypes 1 (0·627; 0·342-1·150) and 4 (0·499; 0·331-0·754) for the 1-year booster, and for serotype 3 (0·911; 0·573-1·450) but not serotypes 1 (0·889; 0·462-1·710), 2 (0·677; 0·402-1·140), and 4 (0·702; 0·447-1·100) for the 2-year booster. Thus, non-inferiority of the 1-year or 2-year booster was not shown after the three-dose or two-dose primary vaccination regimen in dengue-seropositive participants. No safety concerns occurred with the 1-year or 2-year CYD-TDV booster.
Interpretation: CYD-TDV booster 1 year or 2 years after the two-dose or three-dose primary vaccination regimen does not elicit a consistent, meaningful booster effect against all dengue serotypes in participants who are seropositive for dengue at baseline.
Funding: Sanofi Pasteur.
Translation: For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests DLC-M, JP, BZ, GD, ZC, HW, MB, AR, JCR, MAV, and FN are Sanofi Pasteur employees and might hold shares or stock options, or both, in the company. EL-M, MRC, AACB, MCM, IR, and MLAG received funds from Sanofi Pasteur through their institutions to support their work in the CYD65 trial.
Comment in
-
Dengue vaccines: where are we now and where we are going?Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jun;22(6):756-757. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00753-2. Epub 2022 Mar 29. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 35364020 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Immunogenicity and safety of simplified vaccination schedules for the CYD-TDV dengue vaccine in healthy individuals aged 9-50 years (CYD65): a randomised, controlled, phase 2, non-inferiority study.Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;21(4):517-528. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30767-2. Epub 2020 Nov 16. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33212067 Clinical Trial.
-
Immunogenicity and safety of a dengue vaccine given as a booster in Singapore: a randomized Phase II, placebo-controlled trial evaluating its effects 5-6 years after completion of the primary series.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Mar 3;16(3):523-529. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1661204. Epub 2019 Nov 5. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020. PMID: 31464558 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of Takeda's tetravalent dengue vaccine in children in Asia and Latin America: interim results from a phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled study.Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jun;17(6):615-625. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30166-4. Epub 2017 Mar 30. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 28365225 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV) in children aged 2-17 years: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e019368. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019368. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30872537 Free PMC article.
-
From research to phase III: preclinical, industrial and clinical development of the Sanofi Pasteur tetravalent dengue vaccine.Vaccine. 2011 Sep 23;29(42):7229-41. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.094. Epub 2011 Jul 13. Vaccine. 2011. PMID: 21745521 Review.
Cited by
-
The stability analysis of a co-circulation model for COVID-19, dengue, and zika with nonlinear incidence rates and vaccination strategies.Healthc Anal (N Y). 2023 Nov;3:100151. doi: 10.1016/j.health.2023.100151. Epub 2023 Feb 24. Healthc Anal (N Y). 2023. PMID: 36883137 Free PMC article.
-
Trends and insights in dengue virus research globally: a bibliometric analysis (1995-2023).J Transl Med. 2024 Sep 3;22(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05561-5. J Transl Med. 2024. PMID: 39227968 Free PMC article.
-
Dengue Vaccination: A Practical Guide for Clinicians.Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Jan 30;13(2):145. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13020145. Vaccines (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40006692 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials