Patient perspectives on symptoms, health-related quality of life, and treatment experience associated with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
- PMID: 35364733
- PMCID: PMC9135799
- DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06979-7
Patient perspectives on symptoms, health-related quality of life, and treatment experience associated with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to better understand the patient perspective and treatment experience of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
Methods: This qualitative study enrolled adult RRMM patients from 6 US clinics who had ≥ 3 months of life expectancy, ≤ 6 prior lines of therapy, and ≥ 1 treatment regimen with a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulator, or a CD38 monoclonal antibody or an alkylating agent, and a steroid. In-person semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted to capture concepts that were relevant and important to patients. Topics included RRMM symptoms and impacts and the mode of administration, frequency, duration, convenience, side effects, and overall experience with RRMM treatment.
Results: A total of 22 patients completed interviews. At enrollment, 59.1% of participants were using regimens containing dexamethasone, 36.4% daratumumab, 27.3% carfilzomib, and 18.2% lenalidomide. More participants had experience using intravenous or injectable therapy alone (40.9%) than oral therapy alone (18.2%). Back pain and fatigue were the most frequently reported symptoms (40.9% each); 27.3% reported no symptoms. Most participants reported physical function limitations (86.4%), emotional impacts (77.3%), MM-related activity limitations (72.7%), and sleep disturbances (63.6%). Most participants perceived treatment effectiveness based on physician-explained clinical signs (68.2%) and symptom relief (40.9%). Participants experienced gastrointestinal adverse events (59.1%), fatigue (59.1%), sleep disturbances (31.8%), and allergic reactions (31.8%) with treatment. Key elements of treatment burden included the duration of a typical treatment day (68.2%), treatment interfering with daily activities (54.5%), and infusion duration (50.0%).
Conclusions: These results provide treatment experience-related data to further understand RRMM treatment burden and better inform treatment decision-making.
Keywords: Health-related quality of life; Patient experience; Patient-reported outcomes; Relapsed refractory multiple myeloma; Treatment burden; Treatment experience.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
NN has no conflicts of interest to disclose. JB and DC were employees of Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, MA, USA, at the time this research was conducted. PH has received honoraria for consulting from Takeda, BMS, Amgen, Karyopharm, Janssen, and Sanofi. FGS, RS, and KM were employees of Pharmerit – an OPEN Health Company, at the time the research was conducted.
References
-
- National Cancer Institute. SEER cancer stat facts: myeloma. 2020. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/mulmy.html. Accessed April 12 2021
-
- Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV et al (2004) Incidence of multiple myeloma in Olmsted County. Minnesota Cancer 101(11):2667–2674. 10.1002/cncr.20652 - PubMed