Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 13;144(14):6227-6236.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c10536. Epub 2022 Apr 1.

Donor-Acceptor Pyridinium Salts for Photo-Induced Electron-Transfer-Driven Modification of Tryptophan in Peptides, Proteins, and Proteomes Using Visible Light

Affiliations

Donor-Acceptor Pyridinium Salts for Photo-Induced Electron-Transfer-Driven Modification of Tryptophan in Peptides, Proteins, and Proteomes Using Visible Light

Caleb R Hoopes et al. J Am Chem Soc. .

Abstract

Tryptophan (Trp) plays a variety of critical functional roles in protein biochemistry; however, owing to its low natural frequency and poor nucleophilicity, the design of effective methods for both single protein bioconjugation at Trp as well as for in situ chemoproteomic profiling remains a challenge. Here, we report a method for covalent Trp modification that is suitable for both scenarios by invoking photo-induced electron transfer (PET) as a means of driving efficient reactivity. We have engineered biaryl N-carbamoyl pyridinium salts that possess a donor-acceptor relationship that enables optical triggering with visible light whilst simultaneously attenuating the probe's photo-oxidation potential in order to prevent photodegradation. This probe was assayed against a small bank of eight peptides and proteins, where it was found that micromolar concentrations of the probe and short irradiation times (10-60 min) with violet light enabled efficient reactivity toward surface exposed Trp residues. The carbamate transferring group can be used to transfer useful functional groups to proteins including affinity tags and click handles. DFT calculations and other mechanistic analyses reveal correlations between excited state lifetimes, relative fluorescence quantum yields, and chemical reactivity. Biotinylated and azide-functionalized pyridinium salts were used for Trp profiling in HEK293T lysates and in situ in HEK293T cells using 440 nm LED irradiation. Peptide-level enrichment from live cell labeling experiments identified 290 Trp modifications, with 82% selectivity for Trp modification over other π-amino acids, demonstrating the ability of this method to identify and quantify reactive Trp residues from live cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): FJG, DTB, GEM, TRB, CHH MDJ, MS are employees of Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) Functional roles of the “tryptophan-ome” and chemical challenges of targeting tryptophan for chemoproteomic profiling. (B) Harnessing photo-induced electron transfer (PET) for Trp modification using N-carbamoyl pyridinium salts. (C) This work: Visible light activated probe for selective Trp modification in purified peptides and in situ proteomic profiling.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Design, absorption/emission, fluorescence lifetimes, and calculated redox potentials of Trp probe 2a. Calculations were performed using B3LYP 6–31g(d) using an H2O solvent cavity. (B) Labelling of lysozyme with 2a. Cyan residues=Trp, Red residues=Tyr. (C) Stern-Volmer plot of fluorescence quenching of 2a with NATA. (D) Establishment of temporal control with a lamp “on-off” experiment using identical conditions to those shown in Fig. 2B. (E) Mechanistic considerations for the requirement of proximity of [2a]* to the protein of interest. aConversions are estimated by total ion count (TIC) and represent the average of two experiments.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(A) Exploration of the labelling of Trp residues in various purified peptides and proteins using 2a. Cyan residues=Trp, Red residues=Tyr. (B) Calculated solvent accessibilities for all modified and unmodified Trp residues except that of Octreotide are highlighted in the boxplot. (C) Transferring group scope using the 2 scaffold. aConversions estimated by (TIC) and represent the average of two experiments. bModification sites confirmed by MS-MS.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
(A) Evaluation of three Trp probe designs against HEK293T lysates. All experiments were performed in duplicate. (B) Post-enrichment elution profiles of 1a, 1b, and 2b at 0–100 μM probe and at 100 μM probe in the absence of light. (C) Number of proteins identified at 100 μM of each probe. (D) Venn diagram comparing overlap of proteome coverage by each probe. (E) Classes of proteins showing significant enrichment relative to all detected proteins with 100 μM 2b. −Log10 p-values are shown to clearly highlight enrichment. (F) Light dependence of protein-level enrichment with 2b.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
(A) Workflow for peptide level enrichment of Trp in HEK293T cells using bifunctional probe 2d. (B) Volcano plots showing light-dependent and dose-responsive enrichment of the tryptophan-ome from 10–100 μM Trp. Average of two experiments. Light blue dots indicate enriched peptides harboring Trp modifications. Dark blue dots indicate labelled Trp in NPM1 and PARP1. (C) Detected residue modifications by percentage. (D) Chemoselectivity based upon amino acid relative frequency. (E) Subcellular localization of Trp-modified proteins.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
(A) Modification of functionally critical Trp residue in nuclear proteins NPM1 (Trp-290) and PARP1 (Trp-79 and Trp-318). Residues engaging in non-covalent interactions with both Trp residues PARP1 are highlighted. Functionally critical Trp-246, which has lower solvent accessibility and was not modified, is also highlighted. SA=solvent accessibility. (B) Comparison of solvent accessibility in modified and unmodified Trp residues of proteins identified in situ with 2d. (C) Modified Trp residues on proteins associated with various disease states.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
(A) Validation of the identification of NPM1 and PARP1 via western analysis of post-protein level enrichment profiles of HEK293T cells labelled with 2d. (B) Labelling of a recombinant NPM1 C-terminal construct with 2b.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Niphakis MJ; Cravatt BF Enzyme Inhibitor Discovery by Activity-Based Protein Profiling. Annu. Rev. Biochem 2014, 83, 341–77. - PubMed
    2. Cravatt BF; Wright AT; Kozarich JW Activity-Based Protein Profiling: From Enzyme Chemistry to Proteomic Chemistry. Annu Rev Biochem. 2008, 77, 383–414. - PubMed
    3. Heal WP; Dang. THT; Tate EW Activity-based probes: discovering new biology and new drug targets. Chem Soc Rev. 2011, 40, 246–57. - PubMed
    4. Chan WC; Sharifzadeh S; Buhrlage SJ; Marto JA Chemoproteomic methods for covalent drug discovery. Chem. Soc. Rev 2021, 50, 8361–8381. - PMC - PubMed
    5. Spradlin JN; Zhang E; Nomura DK Reimagining Druggability Using Chemoproteomic Platforms. Acc. Chem. Res 2021, 54, 1801–1813. - PubMed
    1. For reviews summarizing cysteine profiling:

    2. Maurais AJ; Weerapana E Reactive-cysteine profiling for drug discovery. Curr. Op. Chem. Biol 2019, 50, 29–36. - PMC - PubMed
    3. Backus KM; Applications of Reactive Cysteine Profiling. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol 2019, 420, 375–417. - PubMed
    4. Guan I; Williams K; Pan J; Liu X New Cysteine Covalent Modification Strategies Enable Advancement of Proteome-wide Selectivity of Kinase Modulators. Asian J. Org. Chem 2021, 10, 949–963.
    5. For examples of lysine profiling

    6. Hacker SM; Backus KM; Lazear MR; Forli S; Correia BE; Cravatt BF Global profiling of lysine reactivity and ligandability in the human proteome. Nature Chemistry. 2017, 9, 1181–1190. - PMC - PubMed
    7. Shannon DA; Banerjee R; Webster ER; Bak DW; Wang C; Weerapana E Investigating the Proteome Reactivity and Selectivity of Aryl Halides. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 3330–3333. - PubMed
    8. For examples targeting N-, O- and S-nucleophiles:

    9. Ward CC; Kleinman JI; Nomura DK NHS-Esters As Versatile Reactivity-Based Probes for Mapping Proteome-Wide Ligandable Hotspots. ACS Chem. Biol 2017, 12, 1478–1483. - PMC - PubMed
    10. For examples of Tyrosine profiling:

    11. Brulet JW; Borne AL; Yuan K; Libby AH; Hsu K-L Liganding Functional Tyrosine Sites on Proteins Using Sulfur-Triazole Exchange Chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 18, 8270–8280. - PMC - PubMed
    12. Sun F; Suttapitugsakul S; Wu R An Azo Coupling-Based Chemoproteomic Approach to Systematically Profile the Tyrosine Reactivity in the Human Proteome. Anal. Chem 2021, 93, 10334–10342. - PMC - PubMed
    13. For Carboxylic acid profiling:

    14. Bach K; Beerkens BLH; Zanon PRA; Hacker SM Light-Activatable, 2,5-Disubstituted Tetrazoles for the Proteome-wide Profiling of Aspartates and Glutamates in Living Bacteria. ACS. Cent. Sci 2020, 6, 546–554. - PMC - PubMed
    15. Ma N; Hu J; Zhang Z-M; Liu W; Huang M; Fan. Y; Yin X; Wang J; Ding K; Ye W; Li Z 2H-Azirine-Based Reagents for Chemoselective Bioconjugation Carboxyl Residues Inside Live Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 6051–6059. - PubMed
    16. For Methionine profiling:

    17. Lin S; Yang X; Jia S; Weeks AM; Hornsby M; Lee PS; Nichiporuk RV; Iavarone AT; Wells JA; Toste FD; Chang CJ Redox-based reagents for chemoselective methionine bioconjugation. Science. 2017, 355, 597–602. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lakhdar S; Westermaier M; Terrier R; Boubaker T; Ofial AR; Mayr H Nucleophilic Reactivites of Indoles. J. Org. Chem 2006, 71, 24, 9088–9095. - PubMed
    1. Scoffone E; Fontana A; Rocchi R Sulfenyl halides as Modifying Reagents for Polypeptides and Protein I. Modification of Tryptophan Residues. Biochemistry. 1968, 7, 971–979. - PubMed
    2. Kuyama H; Watanabe M; Toda C; Ando E; Tanaka K; Nishimura O An approach to quantitative proteome analysis by labeling tryptophan residues. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom 2003, 17, 1642–1650. - PubMed
    3. Antos JM; McFarland JM; Ivarone AT; Francis MB Chemoselective Tryptophan Labeling with Rhodium Carbenoids at Mild pH. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009, 131, 6301–6308. - PMC - PubMed
    4. Ball ZT Designing Enzyme-like Catalysts: A Rhodium(II) Metallopeptide Case Study. Acc. Chem. Res 2013. 46, 560–570. - PubMed
    5. Seki Y; Ishiyama T; Sasaki D; Abe J; Sohma Y; Oisaka K; Kanai M Transition Metal-Free Tryptophan-Selective Bioconjugation of Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 10798–10801. - PubMed
    6. Wang W; Lorion MM; Shah J; Kapdi AR; Ackermann L Late-Stage Peptide Diversification by Position-Selective C–H activation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 2–20. - PubMed
    7. Petersen J; Christensen KE; Nielsen MT; Mortensen KT; Komnatnyy VV; Nielsen TE; Qvortrup K Oxidative Modification of Tryptophan-Containing Peptides. ACS. Comb. Sci 2018, 20, 344–349. - PubMed
    8. Foettinger A; Leitner A; Lindner W Selective Enrichment of Trytophan-Containing Peptides from Protein Digests Employing a Reversible Derivatization with Malondialdehyde and Solid-Phase Capture on Hydrazide Beads. J. Proteome Res 2007, 6, 3827–3834. - PubMed
    9. Yu Y; Zhang LK; Buevich AV; Li G; Tang H; Vachal P; Colletti SL; Shi ZC Chemoselective peptide Modification via Photocataliyic Tryptophan β-position Conjugation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 6797–6800. - PubMed
    1. Tsai C-J; Lin SL; Wolfson HJ; Nussinov R Studies of protein-protein interfaces: A statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect. Protein Sci. 1997, 6, 53–64. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Ma B; Elkayam T; Wolfson H; Nussinov R Protein-protein interactions: Structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 2003, 100, 5772–5777. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types